2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000gl011955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of intense nose structures

Abstract: Abstract.We examine one well-observed event on November 3, 1997, when clear signatures of intense nose structures were observed during substorm activity on three subsequent inner magnetosphere crossings by Polar and Interball Auroral probe. Tracing particles numerically in stationary electric (Volland-Stern) and magnetic (T96) field models shows that the inward displacement of the intense nose structure in this case could not be formed only by convection in a time-stationary electric field. We add time varying… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
68
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ganushkina et al (2000Ganushkina et al ( , 2001) studied the penetration of the plasma sheet ions into the inner magnetosphere using the Li et al (1998) model, together with stationary electric and magnetic fields for particle tracing. They concluded that the inward displacement of these intense nose structures can occur under short-lived impulsive electric fields, combined with the convection electric field.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ganushkina et al (2000Ganushkina et al ( , 2001) studied the penetration of the plasma sheet ions into the inner magnetosphere using the Li et al (1998) model, together with stationary electric and magnetic fields for particle tracing. They concluded that the inward displacement of these intense nose structures can occur under short-lived impulsive electric fields, combined with the convection electric field.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They only considered as nose the structures presenting flux values above 10 6 (cm 2 s sr keV) −1 , whereas CODIF reveals nose structures with smaller fluxes. As a consequence, and if we assume that the absolute flux values increase with increasing activity, it is not surprising that the number of intense events increases with increasing K p , and that the flux threshold defined by Ganushkina et al (2001) is more often reached during more active periods.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ganushkina et al (2001) demonstrated that large-scale electric field changes are not sufficient to explain the fast formation (less than one hour) of these "intense nose events", as named by the authors. They showed that local pulses in the electric field (up to 4 mV/m) associated with substorm dipolarization are necessary to explain such rapid formation time and radial location of the observed features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birn (1987) traced particles in three-dimensional MHD simulations of dipolarization in the magnetotail and showed that particles are mainly accelerated by the betatron mechanism as they are transported by a time-dependent dawn-dusk electric field from the region of a weak magnetic field downtail to a stronger magnetic field at a geosynchronous orbit. Other simulations used an azimuthally wide earthward-propagating electromagnetic pulse to explain geosynchronous injections (e.g., Zaharia et al, 2000;Ganushkina et al, 2001Ganushkina et al, , 2005Ganushkina et al, , 2013Sarris et al, 2002;Li et al, 2003). Authors concluded that injections can be caused by the earthward compression magnetic field perturbation and its associated electric field corresponding to a global magnetotail dipolarization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%