2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/756/1/85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of Millisecond Pulsars From Intermediate- And Low-Mass X-Ray Binaries

Abstract: We present a systematic study of the evolution of intermediate-and low-mass X-ray binaries consisting of an accreting neutron star of mass 1.0-1.8 M and a donor star of mass 1.0-6.0 M . In our calculations we take into account physical processes such as unstable disk accretion, radio ejection, bump-induced detachment, and outflow from the L 2 point. Comparing the calculated results with the observations of binary radio pulsars, we report the following results. (1) The allowed parameter space for forming binary… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
4
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the formation of binary MSPs, this relation proves to be very important because it provides a correlation between the mass of the newly formed WD and P orb following the mass transfer episode (Savonije 1987;Joss et al 1987;Rappaport et al 1995;Tauris & Savonije 1999;Nelson et al 2004;De Vito & Benvenuto 2010;Lin et al 2011;Shao & Li 2012;Jia & Li 2014;Istrate et al 2014a). Figure 19 shows the (M WD , P orb )-relation for all the models computed in this work.…”
Section: Relation Of Mass To Orbital Period In Wdsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For the formation of binary MSPs, this relation proves to be very important because it provides a correlation between the mass of the newly formed WD and P orb following the mass transfer episode (Savonije 1987;Joss et al 1987;Rappaport et al 1995;Tauris & Savonije 1999;Nelson et al 2004;De Vito & Benvenuto 2010;Lin et al 2011;Shao & Li 2012;Jia & Li 2014;Istrate et al 2014a). Figure 19 shows the (M WD , P orb )-relation for all the models computed in this work.…”
Section: Relation Of Mass To Orbital Period In Wdsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This relationship is very important for the formation of binary MSPs because it results in a unique relation between their orbital period (P orb ) and WD mass (M WD ) following the LMXB mass-transfer phase (Savonije 1987;Joss et al 1987;Rappaport et al 1995;Tauris & Savonije 1999;Nelson et al 2004;De Vito & Benvenuto 2010;Shao & Li 2012). The masses of the He WD companions are expected to be between 0.13 < M WD /M < 0.46.…”
Section: The (M Wd P Orb )-Relation For Tight Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, we compare the P f −M WD relations with two different initial NS mass of 1.4 and 2.0 M ⊙ . Though the increase in the NS mass may influence the initial parameter space to form BMSPs (Shao & Li 2012), it barely affects the final P f − M WD relation (De Vito & Benvenuto 2010), so we cannot tell the initial NS mass simply from the current WD mass.…”
Section: The Initial Ns Massmentioning
confidence: 99%