2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.10.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of NiS and CoS semiconductor nanoparticles inside mordenite-type zeolite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3.44 and 3.35 eV for α-NiS prepared at pH 7 and pH 8 respectively. Also, the calculated band gap energy is lower than that of the reported values (3.53-3.90 eV) [42]. It can also be seen from UV-vis spectra that the intensity of transmission (%) decreases while increasing grain size.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…3.44 and 3.35 eV for α-NiS prepared at pH 7 and pH 8 respectively. Also, the calculated band gap energy is lower than that of the reported values (3.53-3.90 eV) [42]. It can also be seen from UV-vis spectra that the intensity of transmission (%) decreases while increasing grain size.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…[22] Cobalt sulfides with different stoichiometric ratios, such as Co 1Àx S, CoS, CoS 2 , Co 9 S 8 , and Co 3 S 4 , are the most important type of metal chalcogenides. These cobalt sulfides have shown great potential for use in LIBs, [18,[23][24][25] semiconductors, [26] magnets, catalysts, [12,13,[27][28][29][30] and photocatalytic degradation. [32] The thermal stability and electrical conductivity of cobalt sulfides are much better than those of other metal sulfides, [23] however, they have a number of major drawbacks, namely Abstract: Cobalt sulfide is a good candidate for both lithium ion batteries (LIBs) and cathodic oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), but low conductivity, poor cyclability, capacity fading, and structural changes hinder its applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). CoS bulk showed an absorption edge at 347 nm, whereas CoS in mordenite showed an absorption edge at 322 nm [12,13]. Comparison of the absorption edge of bulk CoS samples had a blue shift in the onset of absorption observed at 305 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%