2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/451/1/012182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of system of indicators for evaluation of environmental activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyzing the obtained results, we note that the best place in the ranking has the bank JSC "BANK ALLIANCE" with a value of 0.6385. By constructing a verbal-numerical Harrington scale for the obtained rating assessment [1] with a step of 0.25 (Table 8), we obtain a qualitative characteristic of the rating assessment of the risk of the bank's involvement in money laundering.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyzing the obtained results, we note that the best place in the ranking has the bank JSC "BANK ALLIANCE" with a value of 0.6385. By constructing a verbal-numerical Harrington scale for the obtained rating assessment [1] with a step of 0.25 (Table 8), we obtain a qualitative characteristic of the rating assessment of the risk of the bank's involvement in money laundering.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 shows that a close and statistically significant (highlighted in red) relationship is between the indicators I1 та I2, 1 ,00 ˗ 0,04 ˗ 0,02 ˗ 0,01 ˗ 0,05 I15 ˗ 0,06 0,05 ˗ 0,09 ˗ 0,02 0,04 ˗ 0,02 ˗ 0,03 0,01 ˗ 0,07 ˗ 0,07 ˗ 0,08 0,03 ˗ 0,10 ˗ 0,04 1,00 0,96 0,15 0,14 I16 ˗ 0,05 0,08 ˗ 0,08 ˗ 0,02 0,03 ˗ 0,02 ˗ 0,01 0,03 ˗ 0,06 ˗ 0,06 ˗ 0,07 0,05 ˗ 0,08 ˗ 0,02 0,96 1,00 0,13 0,11 I17 ˗ 0,05 0,02 0,52 0,10 0,11 ˗ 0,04 0,02 0,08 ˗ 0,06 ˗ 0,07 ˗ 0,09 0,02 0,13 ˗ 0,01 0,15 0,13 1,00 0,76 I18 ˗ 0,05 ˗ 0,01 0,54 ˗ 0,05 ˗ 0,07 ˗ 0,07 ˗ 0,04 0,00 ˗ 0,07 ˗ 0,06 ˗ 0,08 ˗ 0,03 0,05 ˗ 0,05 0,14 0,11 0,76 1,00…”
unclassified