2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of tetragonal gas bubble superlattice in bulk molybdenum under helium ion implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With validations by atomistic simulations and experiments, several important implications can be drawn from the discovery: i) The superlattice is a superposition of stable perturbation waves at the instability point, whose symmetry is dictated by anisotropic SIA diffusion. This is consistent with the shadowing effect (Forreman 1972;Woo and Frank 1985) and the conclusion of Walgraef et al that a small degree of SIA diffusion anisotropy is needed for vacancy loop ordering (Walgraef et al 1996). The symmetry of these waves defines the superlattice structure, which depends on the kinetics of SIA diffusion but not necessarily the host matrices; ii) A 3-stage formation process, from random voids to planar ordering and then 3D lattice, is implied.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With validations by atomistic simulations and experiments, several important implications can be drawn from the discovery: i) The superlattice is a superposition of stable perturbation waves at the instability point, whose symmetry is dictated by anisotropic SIA diffusion. This is consistent with the shadowing effect (Forreman 1972;Woo and Frank 1985) and the conclusion of Walgraef et al that a small degree of SIA diffusion anisotropy is needed for vacancy loop ordering (Walgraef et al 1996). The symmetry of these waves defines the superlattice structure, which depends on the kinetics of SIA diffusion but not necessarily the host matrices; ii) A 3-stage formation process, from random voids to planar ordering and then 3D lattice, is implied.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The first one states that, based on experimental observations, the superlattices are isomorphic with the hosting matrices for unknown reasons. This theory, albeit the unknown physics behind, has remained to be consistent with most experimental results except for recent observations of fcc superlattices in bcc UMo (Gan et al 2015) and bct superlattices in bcc Mo (Sun et al 2018). The second is the so-called shadowing effect.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike the high thermal stability of the Xe GBS in irradiated U–10Mo heating to 0.78 T m ( T m is the melting point), Kr GBS is thermally unstable in Ni from 0.48–0.51 T m and in Cu from 0.42 T m . In general, the He GBS tends to form within an irradiation temperature window of 0.2–0.4 T m while Kr GBS tends to form from 0.17–0.22 T m in cubic metals , and 0.14–0.32 T m in hcp metals. , The superlattices tend to adopt the crystallographic structure of the host matrix except for fcc Xe GBS in bcc UMo fuel and the formation of tetragonal GBS in bulk Mo implanted with He ions . However, the formation mechanism of GBS especially for Kr GBS or SBS is still not well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the self-organization of the FG bubbles or voids superlattices can be achieved under certain irradiation conditions. While He and Xe gas bubble superlattices (GBSs) have been successfully observed in metals and UMo fuel, respectively, , Kr GBS or solid bubble superlattices (SBSs) have been studied in limited metal systems. The difference between GBS and SBS is the physical state of the noble gas in the superlattices observed in the metallic substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%