2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.100.085413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of two-dimensional small polarons at the conducting LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That means a large number of electrons at this interface are localized in the form of small polarons, which possibly results in decreased superconducting pairing and lowered superconductivity transition temperature which is not detectable with our STM working at 4.5 K. On the other side, the emergence of interfacial polarons encourages us to compare this interface to similar interfacial superconducting systems like FeSe/STO and LaAlO 3 /SrTiO 3 in which solid evidence has been recently discovered that diffusive large polarons play critical roles in the interfacial conductivity , and even enhanced interfacial superconductivity . A recent theoretical work pointed out that small polarons also present at the LaAlO 3 /SrTiO 3 interface but make insignificant contribution to superconductivity . Theoretically, the long-ranged interaction between electrons and phonons that creates polarons has long been considered favorable for superconducting pairing. , However, whether small polarons help in superconducting pairing is largely unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That means a large number of electrons at this interface are localized in the form of small polarons, which possibly results in decreased superconducting pairing and lowered superconductivity transition temperature which is not detectable with our STM working at 4.5 K. On the other side, the emergence of interfacial polarons encourages us to compare this interface to similar interfacial superconducting systems like FeSe/STO and LaAlO 3 /SrTiO 3 in which solid evidence has been recently discovered that diffusive large polarons play critical roles in the interfacial conductivity , and even enhanced interfacial superconductivity . A recent theoretical work pointed out that small polarons also present at the LaAlO 3 /SrTiO 3 interface but make insignificant contribution to superconductivity . Theoretically, the long-ranged interaction between electrons and phonons that creates polarons has long been considered favorable for superconducting pairing. , However, whether small polarons help in superconducting pairing is largely unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 A recent theoretical work pointed out that small polarons also present at the LaAlO 3 /SrTiO 3 interface but make insignificant contribution to superconductivity. 42 Theoretically, the long-ranged interaction between electrons and phonons that creates polarons has long been considered favorable for superconducting pairing. 43,44 However, whether small polarons help in superconducting pairing is largely unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ti ions attracted around the oxygen vacancies in TiO 6 octahedral forms potential minima which localize electrons and holes to form self‐trapped excitons (STE). [ 29–31 ] We found that the time‐resolved PL at 530 nm (2.34 eV) peak is best fitted by the stretched biexponential decay model while time‐resolved PL at 690 nm (1.8 eV) peak could be fitted well by simple biexponential decay model as shown in Figure S6 in the Supporting Information. This indicates that the 2.34 eV luminescence is excited from electron–hole pair excitonic state while 1.8 eV luminescence could possibly be due to the Ti vacancy defect states.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In summary, we have shown the emergence of coexisting charge density waves, polarons, and bipolarons originating from the intrinsic uncompensated charge of the polar TaO 2 -terminated KTaO 3 (001) surface. We have obtained a direct, real-space view of these states, in contrast to similar phenomena at interfaces of heterostructured materials 17 , 45 – 47 , where the charge distribution is not directly accessible. The competition between charge-ordering (CDW and (bi)polaronic states) and homogeneous distribution (2DEG) arises from the contrasting action of spatially extended 5 d orbitals of Ta (favoring charge delocalization) and strong electronic correlation (favoring charge localization).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%