2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40825-016-0042-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of Urea-Based Deposits in an Exhaust System: Numerical Predictions and Experimental Observations on a Hot Gas Test Bench

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the two lowest impact velocities, the numerical values for b max are quite large when compared with Eq. (11). However, this obvious disagreement is plausible.…”
Section: Maximum Spreading Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the two lowest impact velocities, the numerical values for b max are quite large when compared with Eq. (11). However, this obvious disagreement is plausible.…”
Section: Maximum Spreading Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At transient operating conditions, the spray will inevitably impinge on the exhaust gas pipe. Liquid films will be formed on the wall leading to undesired formation of solid deposits [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. As a result, NO x conversion decreases while backpressure increases, affecting both pollutant emissions and engine performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a minimum exhaust gas temperature is required (around 200 C) before urea solution injection, in order to ensure a complete decomposition and hydrolysis of urea to ammonia and to avoid catalyst deactivation, by-products and deposits (Brack et al 2016;Guan et al 2014). Images of collected PM with and without urea injection showed that urea-injected particles had sizes from 200 nm to 1 lm (Lee et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to deposit formation and decomposition the problem with the time scales remains. First steps have been done to include reaction kinetics in the CFD method and to run the simulation for a sufficiently long time but must be considered as demonstration at the moment , . A comprehensive modeling approach that embraces turbulent flow, spray, liquid film and the heterogeneous liquid‐solid‐gas reactions over time ranges of several minutes real time is still missing.…”
Section: Summary and Future Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%