2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of urethane linkage using copolymers of glycidyl methacrylate, methyl methacrylate, and butyl acrylate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The XRD analysis of Pd1/PU did not detect any standard peaks associated with the presence of Pd in a monatomic form, which is consistent with the HAADF-STEM data (Figure 2a). The presence of urethane linkages was confirmed by the peak at 1726 cm −1 in the FI-IR spectra (Figure 2b) and there were no other functional groups in the studied polyurethanes that could significantly affect the catalyst performance [42][43][44][45][46]. Furthermore, there was no substantial alteration in the structural attributes of the catalysts prior to and subsequent to calcination.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The XRD analysis of Pd1/PU did not detect any standard peaks associated with the presence of Pd in a monatomic form, which is consistent with the HAADF-STEM data (Figure 2a). The presence of urethane linkages was confirmed by the peak at 1726 cm −1 in the FI-IR spectra (Figure 2b) and there were no other functional groups in the studied polyurethanes that could significantly affect the catalyst performance [42][43][44][45][46]. Furthermore, there was no substantial alteration in the structural attributes of the catalysts prior to and subsequent to calcination.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 64%