2019
DOI: 10.1175/mwr-d-19-0241.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of Wind Gusts in an Extratropical Cyclone in Light of Doppler Lidar Observations and Large-Eddy Simulations

Abstract: Damaging gusts in windstorms are represented by crude subgrid-scale parameterizations in today’s weather and climate models. This limitation motivated the Wind and Storms Experiment (WASTEX) in winter 2016–17 in the Upper Rhine Valley over southwestern Germany. Gusts recorded at an instrumented tower during the passage of extratropical cyclone “Thomas” on 23 February 2017 are investigated based on measurements of radial wind with ≈70-m along-beam spacing from a fast-scanning Doppler lidar and realistic large-e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diamonds in Figure 7 show that rolls in the WRF simulation consistently possessed large horizontal scales (which ranged from 5 to 8 km), although they were somewhat smaller than the observed rolls. As noted in Section 2.2 and by Pantillon et al [19], the simulation's resolution of 500 m may not suffice to fully resolve rolls of this size, so the wavelengths measured from the WRF simulation must be used with caution. Moreover, because we were not able to pursue any simulation sensitivity analyses of potentially important effects on roll characteristics, such as surface roughness and PBL parameterization, we cannot rule out that the close resemblance of roll signatures manifested by WRF with those observed by radar was coincidental.…”
Section: Horizontal Wavelengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diamonds in Figure 7 show that rolls in the WRF simulation consistently possessed large horizontal scales (which ranged from 5 to 8 km), although they were somewhat smaller than the observed rolls. As noted in Section 2.2 and by Pantillon et al [19], the simulation's resolution of 500 m may not suffice to fully resolve rolls of this size, so the wavelengths measured from the WRF simulation must be used with caution. Moreover, because we were not able to pursue any simulation sensitivity analyses of potentially important effects on roll characteristics, such as surface roughness and PBL parameterization, we cannot rule out that the close resemblance of roll signatures manifested by WRF with those observed by radar was coincidental.…”
Section: Horizontal Wavelengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, rolls with different characteristics and driving mechanisms have since been identified and classified [8,9], with multiple types of rolls also identified and classified for hurricanes [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Large eddy simulations have been used to characterize rolls at finer granularity in recent years [16][17][18], and most recently, rolls have even been observed to be associated with high wind bands in extratropical cyclones [19]. Theoretical underpinning for roll formation has been developed by Mourad and Brown [20] and specifically for hurricane environments by Foster [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most heavy precipitation events in the investigation domain in winter are associated with extratropical cyclones. Within extratropical cyclones, wind speed maxima and precipitation maxima are often linked to fronts and conveyor belts (Parton et al, 2010;Catto and Pfahl, 2013;Pfahl et al, 2014;Pantillon et al, 2020) and this may results in co-located extremes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lidar scanned four different elevation angles (ϕ) between 2.5 • and 10 • above the horizontal plane with a 2.5 • increment. These results are particularly interesting because Figure 13 is among the few sets of published lidar velocity measurements of a thunderstorm gust front [41]. Unfortunately, the heavy rain that occurred behind the gust front affected the lidar measurements by reducing the range of data acquisition from about 5 km at 09:15 UTC to 1-2 km at 09:30 UTC.…”
Section: Lidar Gust Front Detection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 90%