Method and Theory in Paleoethnobotany 2015
DOI: 10.5876/9781607323167.c002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation Processes of the Macrobotanical Record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that acacias were deliberately avoided for cutting due to the value of its fruit for fodder as well as medicinal purposes (Zahran and Willis, 2009: 361; cf. shea nut trees in west Africa, Gallagher, 2014: 30), but a more likely explanation is that tamarisk was both more accessible and preferred for fuel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that acacias were deliberately avoided for cutting due to the value of its fruit for fodder as well as medicinal purposes (Zahran and Willis, 2009: 361; cf. shea nut trees in west Africa, Gallagher, 2014: 30), but a more likely explanation is that tamarisk was both more accessible and preferred for fuel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charring causes changes to the size, shape and proportions of seeds and can also cause fragmentation (Gallagher 2015). Charring experiments using real fire, an open fire of mixed wood fuel, help determine preservation biases, whereas the use of the muffle furnace is more useful in looking at changes in seed morphology during carbonisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of these scenarios seems likely to have applied at the time when Çamlıbel Tarlası was settled, although whether selection occurred under these conditions of abundance is still unclear: preferential use of a very common taxon may look very similar to indiscriminate use of that taxon in proportion to its abundance. If oak were a poor-quality fuel, or provided other economic uses such that it was preferentially ignored when harvesting wood (e.g., for construction [Dufraisse, 2008] or fruit [Gallagher, 2014]), then we might expect a disparity between landscape abundance and use frequency. In this case, however, where fuel was in demand for both metallurgy (all phases) and domestic uses (phases ÇBT II-IV), and given the high fuel value of oak (Marston, 2009), these two scenarios are equally plausible-oak was likely at least very common, if not dominant, in the landscape at the time of settlement.…”
Section: Reconstructing Woodland Vegetationmentioning
confidence: 99%