2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/8164297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation Tracking via Iterative Learning Control for Multiagent Systems with Diverse Communication Time‐Delays

Abstract: In this paper, we consider the formation tracking problem for multiagent systems with diverse communication time-delays by using iterative learning control (ILC) method based on the frequency domain analysis. A first-order ILC law for multiagent systems with diverse communication time-delays is first proposed and its convergence conditions are given by the general Nyquist stability criterion and Gershgorin’s disk theorem. Then, in order for the system to track accurately, a second-order ILC law is presented. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, and ω 0 (see Appendix of [17]). Then the eigenloci of λ[F(ω, β)] for all β ∈ [−π, π), ω ∈ [−π, π), and ω 0 does not enclose the point (−1, j0).…”
Section: Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, and ω 0 (see Appendix of [17]). Then the eigenloci of λ[F(ω, β)] for all β ∈ [−π, π), ω ∈ [−π, π), and ω 0 does not enclose the point (−1, j0).…”
Section: Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, communication delay, packet loss, quantization and so on will cause the ILC of multi-agent to not converge [10,11]. There are specific researches (see [12][13][14][15][16][17]) on communication delay and quantization, but few on communication packet loss. Zhang and Li [18] designed an asynchronous event triggering protocol to solve the consistency problem of multi-agent system in the case of external interference, parameter uncertainty, time-delay, and packet loss by Σ∆ quantizer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%