Formative E-Assessment in Plenary Lectures

Abstract

Little is known about how subjective and objective learning outcomes in plenary lectures are related in the Quality Framework of Higher Education and how they are influenced by formative e-assessment. Given the increasing focus on digitalisation and formative assessment in higher education and the increasing diversity among university students, questions relating to these topics should also be explored within plenary lectures. These lectures constitute the most formal, defined and "bounded" educational practice at universities and it is important to study the question of whether the relationship between student diversity, pedagogy and technology can re-define some of the pedagogical underpinnings that are historically associated with lecturer-centred pedagogy. This paper aims to identify: (1) factors that influence the relationship between intended and subjective learning outcomes in plenary lectures; and (2) how formative e-assessment may improve moments of contingency by increasing the consistency between intended and subjective learning outcomes. The results of this study show that audience response systems (ARS) can enhance formative e-assessment in plenary lectures and reduce the discrepancy between the intended learning outcome and the subjective learning outcome in such lectures with several hundred students. The implications of the current paper are twofold: first, a better understanding of similarities and dissimilarities in students' learning processes in plenary lectures and how these processes may be affected by formative e-assessment has implications for the planning and implementation of teaching and learning in higher education. Second, this has implications for how we can reduce the discrepancy between the intended, subjective and objective learning outcomes in plenary lectures.

Beyond Measure: Using Co-Generative Dialogues as Formative Assessments to Improve Project-Based Learning in an Internship

“…Second, this study provides exemplary empirical scenarios to showcase how cogens can transform conventional formative assessments. Educators have called for research to investigate how instruction revolutions and feedback intertwine (Huang, 2012), and how and to what extent students actually make use of the feedback they are given to achieve a greater level of understanding (Krumsvik & Ludvigsen, 2012). The findings demonstrate that cogens promote inclusive discussions about effective teaching methods meeting student needs, actions aligned with individual learning styles, and the accountability of both instructors and students.…”

Developing design principles and task types for classroom response system tasks in mathematics

“…The idea of using a CRS to gather evidence of students' thinking, and using this as a starting point for generating productive classroom discussions, harmonizes with principles of formative assessment. In fact, literature reviews (Caldwell, 2007;Egelandsdal et al, 2019;Kay & LeSage, 2009) and other case studies in mathematics education (Kay et al, 2010;King & Robinson, 2009;Krumsvik & Ludvigsen, 2012) point out that one of the most important benefits of using a CRS is the possibility to improve formative assessment practices, and especially provide feedback to students. As such, the use of a CRS creates opportunities for instant formative feedback in direct relation to the students' work with mathematical tasks.…”