2014
DOI: 10.24033/asens.2230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formes modulaires de Hilbert modulo $p$ et valeurs d'extensions entre caractères galoisiens

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This immediate from Lemmas 6.1, 6.2, 7.1 and 7.2, and a standard level lowering recipe derived in (Freitas and Siksek, 2015a, Section 2.3) from the work of Jarvis, Fujiwara and Rajaei. Alternatively, one could use modern modularity lifting theorems which integrate level lowering with modularity lifting, as for example in Breuil and Diamond (2014).…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This immediate from Lemmas 6.1, 6.2, 7.1 and 7.2, and a standard level lowering recipe derived in (Freitas and Siksek, 2015a, Section 2.3) from the work of Jarvis, Fujiwara and Rajaei. Alternatively, one could use modern modularity lifting theorems which integrate level lowering with modularity lifting, as for example in Breuil and Diamond (2014).…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(We refer to Remark 4.5.8 for variations on assumption (ii). The stronger assumptions appearing in Remark 4.5.9 are analogous to the multiplicity one conditions appearing in [BD14].) Interestingly, the argument proving Theorem A also lets us deduce the hardest part of Theorem D, namely the existence of the shadow weights F (a, c, b − p + 1), F (b + p − 1, a, c) in the two exceptional cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…By Stickelberger's theorem (see e.g. [BD14], Théorème 2.5.1) one has ord p (κ 1 ) = 0, ord p (κ 2 ) = 1 and…”
Section: Let Us Definementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimal level case. We recall the minimal level case as in [6] and more generally in [13]. Fix a place v|p.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can use the action of Hecke operators away from v on π D (r) to define a local factor π D v (r) at v, which is an admissible smooth representation of GL 2 (F v ), and is supposed to be the right candidate in the mod p local Langlands correspondence, and many important properties about it have been established, see e.g. [14], [6], [13]. Our main result is the following theorem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%