2012
DOI: 10.1126/science.1226073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forming a Moon with an Earth-like Composition via a Giant Impact

Abstract: In the giant impact theory, the Moon formed from debris ejected into an Earth-orbiting disk by the collision of a large planet with the early Earth. Prior impact simulations predict that much of the disk material originates from the colliding planet. However, Earth and the Moon have essentially identical oxygen isotope compositions. This has been a challenge for the impact theory, because the impactor's composition would have likely differed from that of Earth. We simulated impacts involving larger impactors t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
534
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 570 publications
(550 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
12
534
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Some have invoked the evection resonance to permit the Moon to be created with collision parameters that are quite different to the Canonical model, satisfying both the dynamical and isotopic constraints (e.g. Canup 2012;Ćuk and Stewart 2012;Reufer et al 2012), while others have argued that the Canonical model parameters still satisfy the isotopic constraints, e.g., if some equilibration of the accreted material occurs in the protolunar disk (Pahlevan and Stevenson 2007;Salmon and Canup 2012) or if the impactor formed sufficiently close to the Earth (Mastrobuono-Battisti et al 2015), but the basic idea of the origin of the Moon in a giant impact does not seem to be in doubt.…”
Section: Earth-moon Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have invoked the evection resonance to permit the Moon to be created with collision parameters that are quite different to the Canonical model, satisfying both the dynamical and isotopic constraints (e.g. Canup 2012;Ćuk and Stewart 2012;Reufer et al 2012), while others have argued that the Canonical model parameters still satisfy the isotopic constraints, e.g., if some equilibration of the accreted material occurs in the protolunar disk (Pahlevan and Stevenson 2007;Salmon and Canup 2012) or if the impactor formed sufficiently close to the Earth (Mastrobuono-Battisti et al 2015), but the basic idea of the origin of the Moon in a giant impact does not seem to be in doubt.…”
Section: Earth-moon Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, most numerical simulations of impacts between rock/metal protoplanets have been performed with the goal of reproducing the mass, angular momentum, and composition of the Earth-Moon system (e.g., [15,16,19,20,24,[65][66][67][68]). Early simulations of the Moon-forming impact were forced, due to computational constraints, to use low numerical resolution, or to use simplified equations of state, leading to unphysical behaviors for rock and metal at high temperatures and pressures.…”
Section: Impact Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large impact-generated disks can form in collisions with higher velocities, a few×v esc , but this phenomenon has been explored for only a limited range of impactor-to-target mass ratios, and impact angles [19,20].…”
Section: Impact Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The change in angular momentum corresponding to modern inclination excitation of ~5 degrees is likely a few tens of percent or less. Hence, the standard giant impact scenario 4 followed by little subsequent dynamical modification is compatible with the dynamical state of the modern system, while a high angular momentum impact scenario 3,5 would require another dynamical mechanism such as the evection resonance 3,12,16 to be reconciled with the modern EM system. Each suite of simulations is composed of two subsets: one with late accretion delivered via 1 body (greater excitation), the other 4 (lesser excitation).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%