2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-7001-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forming limit prediction of anisotropic material subjected to normal and through thickness shear stresses using a modified M–K model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 demonstrate that the application of compressive normal stresses on a sheet allows its formability to be enhanced, especially in the range of positive strain paths. These results are consistent with several earlier investigations (see, e.g., [10,13,14]). a b Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 demonstrate that the application of compressive normal stresses on a sheet allows its formability to be enhanced, especially in the range of positive strain paths. These results are consistent with several earlier investigations (see, e.g., [10,13,14]). a b Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 94%
“…As a result of this investigation, a new generalized forming limit diagram has been proposed, which highlights the influence of normal stress components on the formability limits. The numerical approach developed in Allwood and Shouler [13] has been extended by Fatemi and Dariani [14] by taking into account the plastic anisotropy of the sheet via the use of the Hill'48 yield criterion. In both of these contributions, the strain and stress distributions have been assumed to be homogeneous through the thickness of the sheet during the deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of this earlier investigation, a new generalized forming limit diagram has been proposed, which highlights the influence of normal stress component on the formability limit. Note that a specifically designed linear paddle testing apparatus has been used in [9] to experimentally assess the increase in formability limits due to the application of normal compressive stresses. It is shown in this latter study that the use of simplifying assumptions, such as plastic isotropy, results in some discrepancies between numerical predictions and experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown in this latter study that the use of simplifying assumptions, such as plastic isotropy, results in some discrepancies between numerical predictions and experimental results. To avoid this drawback, Fatemi and Dariani [9] extended the approach developed in [8] , by taking into account the plastic anisotropy of the sheet via the application of Hill '48 yield criterion. Another extension of the Marciniak and Kuczynski approach has been developed in [10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the tubes were bulged under the combined actions of internal and external pressures, the stress state must be treated as threedimensional stress state. Moreover, several forming limit theory models, which considering the effect of through-thickness normal stress, has been established based on the classical plastic instability theory and M-K approach, respectively [25][26][27]. So far, the mechanical properties of thin-walled anisotropic tubes under three-dimensional stress state have not yet been realized due to the challenge of experimental setup for doublesided tube hydro-bulging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%