2002
DOI: 10.1080/09500690110049123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

'Forms of energy', an intermediary language on the road to thermodynamics? Part II

Abstract: In secondary education, 'energy' is often introduced by distinguishing different 'forms of energy' for different phenomena. Of these forms of energy, only kinetic and potential energy are accepted in current science. The question has been raised whether 'forms of energy' should be eliminated from secondary school science curricula. As a contribution to this discussion we have analysed 'forms of energy' language for inconsistencies and limitations of validity in Part I. In this second part, results are presente… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally accepted that these forms of energy fall into two broad classes: kinetic energy, which involves motion, and potential energy, which is stored in fields. Many scholars do not see a problem with the 'forms of energy' language, arguing that if used correctly this metaphor can represent a scientifically accurate understanding of energy (Kaper & Goedhart, 2010;Nordine et al, 2011;Trumper 1990). Obviously, this metaphor highlights the transformation of energy, particularly when used in tandem with the conservation principle.…”
Section: Energy As a Substance That Can Change Formsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is generally accepted that these forms of energy fall into two broad classes: kinetic energy, which involves motion, and potential energy, which is stored in fields. Many scholars do not see a problem with the 'forms of energy' language, arguing that if used correctly this metaphor can represent a scientifically accurate understanding of energy (Kaper & Goedhart, 2010;Nordine et al, 2011;Trumper 1990). Obviously, this metaphor highlights the transformation of energy, particularly when used in tandem with the conservation principle.…”
Section: Energy As a Substance That Can Change Formsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, instead of using terms such as synthesis and decomposition reactions, these were labeled as 2→ 1 and 1 → 2 types of reactions, with the digits referring, respectively, to the number of substances disappearing or appearing. Following Kaper and Goedhart (, ), we see such terms and phrasings as examples of an intermediary language , which has a preparatory function but is not the final language the curriculum aims to construct. Such intermediary language might sound strange to a chemist, but to students it often gives a reasonable account of a recognizable regularity, and using this interpretation they are likely to be able to progress in their learning.…”
Section: A New Chemistry Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both approaches received considerable criticism. For example, introducing students to the energy concept through the idea of energy forms may be a hindrance for future learning about energy (Kaper and Goedhart 2002), may nurture the idea of energy as a quasi-material substance (Warren 1982) or may teach students labels instead of a deeper understanding (Swackhamer 2005).…”
Section: Students' Understanding Of the Energy Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%