2013
DOI: 10.1112/plms/pdt044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forms representing forms and linear spaces on hypersurfaces

Abstract: Abstract. For a given set of forms ψ (1) , . . . , ψ (R) ∈ Z[t 1 , . . . , tm] of degree d we prove a Hasse principle for representations of the shape. . , xs] of the same degree, provided that s ≫ R 2 m d and the forms F (ρ) are 'sufficiently non-singular'. This result is then used to derive asymptotical behaviour of the number of m-dimensional linear spaces contained in the intersection of the F (ρ) if the degree is odd. A further application dispenses with the non-singularity condition and establishes the e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Birch's work [3] is generalised to systems of forms with differing degrees by Browning and Heath-Brown [7] over Q and by Frei and Madritsch [16] over number fields. It is extended to linear spaces of solutions by Brandes [5,6]. Versions of the result for function fields are due to Lee [22] and to Browning and Vishe [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birch's work [3] is generalised to systems of forms with differing degrees by Browning and Heath-Brown [7] over Q and by Frei and Madritsch [16] over number fields. It is extended to linear spaces of solutions by Brandes [5,6]. Versions of the result for function fields are due to Lee [22] and to Browning and Vishe [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More general versions of each of the cases of Theorem 1.1 are available below (see Theorems 4.1, 7.1) that somewhat relax the requirement that F should be smooth. The glaring omission here is of course the case d = 2m; while the analytical aspects of the treatment of this case are in fact more conventional than in the situation when d = 2m and largely follow the arguments of [1,2], the geometry creates additional difficulties when the singularities of F interfere with the discriminant equation. We plan to resolve this issue in future work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, this can be avoided by pruning instead a different set of major arcs that can be defined for any positive θ 1. We record here Lemma 3.5 of [2], which serves as starting point for our first pruning step. …”
Section: The Minor Arcs In the Case D > 2mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations