2016
DOI: 10.2208/journalofjsce.4.1_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formula on Energy Losses at Three-Way Circular Drop Manhole Under Surcharge Flow

Abstract: Energy loss at manholes under surcharged conditions is as important as the friction loss in pipes in the design of storm sewer networks and in flood analysis. Some researchers have already proposed the formula to calculate the energy loss at three-way manholes under surcharged conditions. However, in most of these proposed formulas, all variables of structural elements for the pipes and the manholes have not been considered enough yet. Therefore, development of the formula to exactly calculate the energy loss … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results in Figure 11 show that the tendencies of the total head loss coefficients were in a relatively good agreement for both empirical formulae. It was observed that the formula proposed by ARAO et al (2016) performs better than the formula of UDDM for K and K 2 . However, the formula of UDDM has better accuracy than ARAO et al (2016) in terms of calculating K 1 .…”
Section: Validation Of Empirical Head Loss Coefficient Formulaementioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Results in Figure 11 show that the tendencies of the total head loss coefficients were in a relatively good agreement for both empirical formulae. It was observed that the formula proposed by ARAO et al (2016) performs better than the formula of UDDM for K and K 2 . However, the formula of UDDM has better accuracy than ARAO et al (2016) in terms of calculating K 1 .…”
Section: Validation Of Empirical Head Loss Coefficient Formulaementioning
confidence: 97%
“…It was observed that the formula proposed by ARAO et al (2016) performs better than the formula of UDDM for K and K 2 . However, the formula of UDDM has better accuracy than ARAO et al (2016) in terms of calculating K 1 .…”
Section: Validation Of Empirical Head Loss Coefficient Formulaementioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations