2004
DOI: 10.3208/sandf.44.5_109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulas for an Infinitely Long Bernoulli-Euler Beam on the Pasternak Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It proved that the stresses decrease to some extent owing to the shear rigidity. However, Pasternak's solution was only for a limited case; thus, Tanahashi gave a complete set of formulas for an infinitely long Bernoulli‐Euler Beam on a Pasternak Model and showed the differences in stresses depending on the shear rigidity.…”
Section: Mechanical Models Of Embedmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It proved that the stresses decrease to some extent owing to the shear rigidity. However, Pasternak's solution was only for a limited case; thus, Tanahashi gave a complete set of formulas for an infinitely long Bernoulli‐Euler Beam on a Pasternak Model and showed the differences in stresses depending on the shear rigidity.…”
Section: Mechanical Models Of Embedmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e vertical displacement y 1 of a half infinitely long beam on the Pasternak model in the two-dimensional plain strain condition can be expressed as follows [14][15][16]:…”
Section: Calculation Model For the Buried Pipeline As Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e Pasternak model is called the "two-parameter model" as it includes the coefficient of the subgrade reaction and shear modules of the soil. Tanahashi [14] presented a set of equations to estimate the displacements and stress on an infinitely long Bernoulli-Euler beam using the Pasternak model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the development of numerous commercial finite-element (FE) software, renewed interest in this topic of analytical foundation modeling is on the rise recently (Avramidis and Morfidis, 2006;Colasanti and Horvath, 2010;Failla et al, 2013;Horvath and Colasanti, 2011;Tanahashi, 2004;Wang et al, 2005;Worku, 2010;Worku and Degu, 2010;Worku, 2013;Yin, 2000). This could be attributed to a number of reasons including the mesh dependence of FE modeling, lack of accurate geotechnical data for use in advanced constitutive relationships, relative difficulty to use FE models to solve routine problems in design offices like modeling the soil and structure together as a unit, and need for controlling FE analysis results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%