2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulation and calibration of higher-order elastic localization relationships using the MKS approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, m h s takes values of 0 or 1 depending on the local state occupying each voxel in each MVE. Similar descriptions have been successfully implemented in prior work for microstructure classification [9,10,25], microstructure reconstructions [47], and establishing process-structure-property linkages [28,30,34,44].…”
Section: Machine Learning Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, m h s takes values of 0 or 1 depending on the local state occupying each voxel in each MVE. Similar descriptions have been successfully implemented in prior work for microstructure classification [9,10,25], microstructure reconstructions [47], and establishing process-structure-property linkages [28,30,34,44].…”
Section: Machine Learning Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Historically, the multiscale materials modeling efforts have addressed either homogenization (communication of information from the lower length scale to the higher length scale) [30][31][32][33] or localization (communication of information from the higher length scale to the lower length scale) [8,13,14,[34][35][36]. Although both homogenization and localization have been studied extensively in literature using physically based approaches [31][32][33]37], recent work has identified the tremendous benefits of fusing these approaches with data-driven approaches [8,13,14,30,[34][35][36]. However, most of the prior effort has only addressed a limited number of the multiscale features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MKS is a statistical tool using a response variable of the local material state to estimate the local phase or stress status of the microstructure in an applied thermal or strain field [28,29,46]. MKS provides efficient calculations to simulate the elastic deformation of the microstructure.…”
Section: Elastic Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the MKS approach dramatically improves the accuracy of these expressions by calibrating the convolution kernels in these expressions to results from previously validated physics-based models. In recent work [126], the MKS approach was demonstrated to successfully capture the tails of the microscale stress and strain distributions in composite systems with relatively high contrast, using the higher-order terms in the localization relationships. It was also demonstrated that the MKS approach can be applied to problems involving nonlinear material behaviour such as spinodal decomposition [125] and rigid plastic deformation [127].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the central idea behind the recently formulated scale-bridging framework called microstructure knowledge systems (MKS) [13,[125][126][127][128]. Building on the statistical continuum theories developed by Kroner [129,130], MKS establishes high-fidelity microstructure propertyprocessing relationships that are amenable for bidirectional exchange of information between the constituent hierarchical length scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%