2016
DOI: 10.2172/1256684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulation and preparation of Hanford Waste Treatment Plant direct feed low activity waste Effluent Management Facility core simulant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the time condensate samples used for the basis for the simulant were generated, the simulant being fed to the DuraMelter-10 were based on actual wastes expected during the DFLAW operations. Preparation and analysis of the core LMOGC simulant by SRNL has been described elsewhere [7]. This work added arsenic, selenium, cyanide, and mercury to the composition in order to quantify their fate and disposition.…”
Section: Testing Basis and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time condensate samples used for the basis for the simulant were generated, the simulant being fed to the DuraMelter-10 were based on actual wastes expected during the DFLAW operations. Preparation and analysis of the core LMOGC simulant by SRNL has been described elsewhere [7]. This work added arsenic, selenium, cyanide, and mercury to the composition in order to quantify their fate and disposition.…”
Section: Testing Basis and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time that the condensate samples were generated, the simulant melter feed to the DM-10 was similar to actual wastes that are expected during the Direct Feed LAW operations. Preparation and analysis of the simulant has been described elsewhere [5]. For this test, a vacuum evaporator system was assembled and is similar in construction to a prior system [6] since design details of the future EMF evaporator are not yet available.…”
Section: Testing Basis and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrate Analysis for Concentrated Simulant Samples .................................... 21 Figure 3-12. Analysis of Condensate ............................................................................................Figure[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%