2015
DOI: 10.15171/ps.2015.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulation of a Food Grade Water-In-Oil Nanoemulsion: Factors Affecting on Stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certainly, the use of PGPR at surfactant concentration of 4% w/w led to W1/O emulsions with particle size bellow 1 µm ( Figure 1A). PGPR may be able to better interact with lipid phase due to its higher hydrophobicity compared to Span 80, thus forming a kinetic barrier protecting the emulsion against droplets coalescence (Tabibiazar and Hamishehkar 2015). Therefore, the chosen hydrophobic surfactant used for the formation of the subsequent double emulsions was PGPR (4% w/w).…”
Section: Effect Of Type and Concentration Of The Hydrophobic Surfactamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly, the use of PGPR at surfactant concentration of 4% w/w led to W1/O emulsions with particle size bellow 1 µm ( Figure 1A). PGPR may be able to better interact with lipid phase due to its higher hydrophobicity compared to Span 80, thus forming a kinetic barrier protecting the emulsion against droplets coalescence (Tabibiazar and Hamishehkar 2015). Therefore, the chosen hydrophobic surfactant used for the formation of the subsequent double emulsions was PGPR (4% w/w).…”
Section: Effect Of Type and Concentration Of The Hydrophobic Surfactamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenge in emulsion technology is their stability, once they are thermodynamically unstable systems [10][11][12]. However, the kinetic transition to the water/oil separated phases can be so slow that the emulsion may be considered metastable [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in the W 1 droplet size observed in the different lipid phases might be attributed to several reasons. On the one hand, it has been reported that the efficiency of the droplet size reduction during emulsification increases as the ratio of the dispersed phase to the continuous phase viscosities decrease [ 18 , 19 ]. This might be attributed to higher mechanical forces created during homogenization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%