2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulation of cracked beam element for analysis of fractured skeletal structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Christides and Barr [3] modified the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory to include the e↵ect of one or more pairs of symmetric open cracks in a structural member of simple geometric form. In Bouboulas et al [4], a cracked beam finite element for the modeling of fractured skeletal structures is introduced. The sti↵ness matrix of the cracked beam element is derived by using the direct sti↵ness method, which is a function of the crack depth and position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Christides and Barr [3] modified the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory to include the e↵ect of one or more pairs of symmetric open cracks in a structural member of simple geometric form. In Bouboulas et al [4], a cracked beam finite element for the modeling of fractured skeletal structures is introduced. The sti↵ness matrix of the cracked beam element is derived by using the direct sti↵ness method, which is a function of the crack depth and position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yuen 4 considered that a crack in a finite element causes a reduction in its Young's modulus, while Bachschmid et al 5 represented the crack by reducing the cross-sectional area of the finite element at the crack position. Recently, Bouboulas and Anifantis 6 constructed a cracked finite element to approximate a conventional finite element with a crack. These so-called open crack models are based on the assumption that the crack always remains open during vibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of published studies assume that the crack in a structural member always remains open during vibration [3][4][5][6][7]. However, this assumption may not be valid when dynamic loadings are dominant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%