2001
DOI: 10.5802/aif.1840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formules de classes pour les corps abéliens réels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our Theorem 8.1 is closely related to one of the principal results of L. V. Kuzmin in [8], which was reproved in a more direct way by J.-R. Belliard and T. Nguyen Quang Do in [1]. If we fix a prime p (which is supposed to be odd in [1]), any real abelian field F can be written as the compositum F = KL, where the degree of K/Q is a power of p and the degree of L/Q is relatively prime to p. Taking any Z p -valued Q p -irreducible character χ of Gal(F/K), the mentioned result describes the fudge factor c χ in the following formula…”
Section: Annales De L'institut Fouriersupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our Theorem 8.1 is closely related to one of the principal results of L. V. Kuzmin in [8], which was reproved in a more direct way by J.-R. Belliard and T. Nguyen Quang Do in [1]. If we fix a prime p (which is supposed to be odd in [1]), any real abelian field F can be written as the compositum F = KL, where the degree of K/Q is a power of p and the degree of L/Q is relatively prime to p. Taking any Z p -valued Q p -irreducible character χ of Gal(F/K), the mentioned result describes the fudge factor c χ in the following formula…”
Section: Annales De L'institut Fouriersupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This follows from the fact that each factor is a positive integer since [11,Lemma 5.1] holds true for Q p [G] even though it is formulated for Q [G] only. The authors of [1] probably had exactly this reasoning in mind in their remark a)(i) on page 921.…”
Section: Annales De L'institut Fouriermentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), which has been proved in [20] and later with a different method in [18] (2) A proof of the equivariant conjecture for Tate motives Q(r) and r G 0 over abelian number fields and p # 2 is given by Burns and Greither in [6]. (3) [3] and [29] Remark.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the general case of the Lichtenbaum conjecture, it is now proven with the same caveat (Bloch-Kato conjecture) for K abelian over Q, by the work of Fleckinger-Kolster-Nguyen Quang Do [47] (see also [15] and [16, appendix]). For nonabelian K we are still far from a proof.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%