2006
DOI: 10.1080/00043249.2006.10791195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forum: Eco-tistical Art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such efforts require explicit attention to understanding diversity and the eco-social structural relationships between language, culture, and education that define how we recognize and understand difference. I draw from Weintraub et al’s ( 2006 ) introduction of the term eco-tistical in response to a lack of terminology in the English language that describes “humans relating to the nonhuman environment in a harmonious, respectful, and pragmatic manner” (p. 55). By switching ego- to eco- , she intended to direct “focus away from self and toward home or habitat” in response to the absence of any opposite terminology for anthropocentric—the privileging of humanity—and egocentric—the privileging of self (Weintraub et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Ecocritical Pedagogies In the Twenty-first Centurymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such efforts require explicit attention to understanding diversity and the eco-social structural relationships between language, culture, and education that define how we recognize and understand difference. I draw from Weintraub et al’s ( 2006 ) introduction of the term eco-tistical in response to a lack of terminology in the English language that describes “humans relating to the nonhuman environment in a harmonious, respectful, and pragmatic manner” (p. 55). By switching ego- to eco- , she intended to direct “focus away from self and toward home or habitat” in response to the absence of any opposite terminology for anthropocentric—the privileging of humanity—and egocentric—the privileging of self (Weintraub et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Ecocritical Pedagogies In the Twenty-first Centurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I draw from Weintraub et al’s ( 2006 ) introduction of the term eco-tistical in response to a lack of terminology in the English language that describes “humans relating to the nonhuman environment in a harmonious, respectful, and pragmatic manner” (p. 55). By switching ego- to eco- , she intended to direct “focus away from self and toward home or habitat” in response to the absence of any opposite terminology for anthropocentric—the privileging of humanity—and egocentric—the privileging of self (Weintraub et al, 2006 ). In this sense, the term ecocentric is an adjective for ecological consciousness, or what Martusewicz and Edmundson ( 2005 ) propose as an “eco-ethical consciousness” (p. 73) that takes into consideration the social and environmental impact of decision-making and recognizes them as inextricably linked.…”
Section: Ecocritical Pedagogies In the Twenty-first Centurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach suggests that academics focus on values related to diversity and the structural eco-social correlations that exist educationally, culturally, and linguistically and control the ways in which we acknowledge and comprehend differences. Lupinacci and others—for example, Weintraub et al ( 2006 )—introduce the term eco-tistical to compensate for the absence of an English-language term describing “humans relating to the nonhuman environment in a harmonious, respectful, and pragmatic manner” (p. 55). By swapping out ego - for eco -, they move the “focus away from self and toward home or habitat” (Weintraub et al 2006 , p. 55) to make up for the lack of an antonym for anthropocentric (revolving around humans) and egocentric (revolving around the self).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lupinacci and others—for example, Weintraub et al ( 2006 )—introduce the term eco-tistical to compensate for the absence of an English-language term describing “humans relating to the nonhuman environment in a harmonious, respectful, and pragmatic manner” (p. 55). By swapping out ego - for eco -, they move the “focus away from self and toward home or habitat” (Weintraub et al 2006 , p. 55) to make up for the lack of an antonym for anthropocentric (revolving around humans) and egocentric (revolving around the self). In this context, eco-centrism describes the ecological consciousness that Martusewicz and Edmondson ( 2005 ) define as being an “eco-ethical consciousness” (p. 73), one that considers the environmental and social impacts of decisions and acknowledges that they are effectively indivisible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such efforts require explicit attention to understanding diversity and the eco-social structural relationships between language, culture, and education that define how we recognize and understand difference. I draw from Weintraub's (2006) introduction of the term eco-tistical in response to a lack of terminology in the English language that describes "humans relating to the nonhuman environment in a harmonious, respectful, and pragmatic manner" (p. 55). By switching ego-to eco-she intended to direct "focus away from self and toward home or habitat" in response to the absence of any opposite terminology for anthropocentric-the privileging of humanity-and egocentric-the privileging of self (Weintraub, et al, 2006, p.55).…”
Section: (Re)constituting Educational Leadership In the 21 St Centurymentioning
confidence: 99%