2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.03.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward and inverse modelling approaches for prediction of light stimulus from electrophysiological response in plants

Abstract: In this paper, system identification approach has been adopted to develop a novel dynamical model for describing the relationship between light as an environmental stimulus and the electrical response as the measured output for a bay leaf (Laurus nobilis) plant. More specifically, the target is to predict the characteristics of the input light stimulus (in terms of on-off timing, duration and intensity) from the measured electrical response-leading to an inverse problem. We explored two major classes of system… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One initial attempt in this direction is provided by Chatterjee et al, where the authors measured and systemized 19 unique plant responses to light conditions. They further built a mathematical model to describe the relationship between light as an environmental stimulus and the electrical response as the measured output for a bay leaf ( Laurus nobilis ) plant ( Figure a) …”
Section: Plant‐based Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One initial attempt in this direction is provided by Chatterjee et al, where the authors measured and systemized 19 unique plant responses to light conditions. They further built a mathematical model to describe the relationship between light as an environmental stimulus and the electrical response as the measured output for a bay leaf ( Laurus nobilis ) plant ( Figure a) …”
Section: Plant‐based Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the five classifiers, then the average accuracy of classification was 70%, and the best individual accuracy was 73.67% [47]. The forward and inverse modelling approaches for prediction of light stimulus from electrophysiological response in plants were established by Chatterjee and his coworkers [48].…”
Section: Plant Electrical Signal Recognition and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, the model is also a representative of several practical contexts, such as muscle fiber dynamics [8] and electrophysiological response of plants [9] in biology, control of a distillation plant in industry [10], identification of core temperature in nuclear reactors [11], and human tracking in computer vision [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%