Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Breeding, Biotechnology and Molecular Tools 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22521-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward and Reverse Genetics in Crop Breeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…TILLING data from over 15 plant species has shown that EMS primarily causes G:C to A:T base transitions (Jankowicz-Cieslak and Till, 2015). Reported deviations in this spectrum may be due to variations in mismatch repair.…”
Section: Commentary Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TILLING data from over 15 plant species has shown that EMS primarily causes G:C to A:T base transitions (Jankowicz-Cieslak and Till, 2015). Reported deviations in this spectrum may be due to variations in mismatch repair.…”
Section: Commentary Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a natural setting, genetic diversity is increased in vegetatively propagated crops via the accumulation of spontaneous mutations. Researchers and breeders can further alter the genetics of vegetatively propagated crops through methods including inducing mutations, transgenics, cell fusion hybrids and various genome-editing approaches (Jankowicz-Cieslak and Till 2015). Inducing mutations in combination with other methods such as in vitro techniques is advantageous for the improvement and diversification of vegetatively propagated germplasm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used chemical mutagen is ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) which in many species produces almost exclusively G:C to A:T transition mutations (Kurowska et al 2011). Other mutagens such as gamma and fast neutron irradiation can produce a broader spectrum of mutations ranging from SNPs and small indels to deletions greater than one million base pairs (Jankowicz-Cieslak and Till 2015). While phenotypic consequences of large indels and rearrangements may be greater, data sets on the spectrum and density of such mutations are currently much smaller than that of EMS, and therefore predictability of optimal population size required to recover desired alleles is much lower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 3200 new varieties have been produced through mutation induction, and these have contributed towards improving food security in many countries (MVD 2016;Jankowicz-Cieslak and Till 2015). Breeding was, and is still, a game of numbers where phenotypes play a central role, whether routine hybridization is involved or reverse genetics such as Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes (TILLING) is contemplated (Kurowska et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%