2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward conditioning with wheel running causes place aversion in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The author is not prepared to offer any certain explanation for this kind of behavioral inertia or Bresistance to change.^A related question to be clarified is acquisition of pica over running days because this might be another case of Bresistance to change.Ô therwise, the strength of discomfort grows by repeated opportunities of wheel running. It is noteworthy that we have once claimed that the opponent-process theory of motivation (Solomon, 1980;Solomon & Corbit, 1974) is applicable to rats' running-based place avoidance (Masaki & Nakajima, 2008), where we speculated that repeated experience of running might evoke a initially large but gradually dwindling unpleasant physiological state as the Ba-process^and a secondary but gradually developing pleasant state as the Bb-process.^The acquisition of pica across days, however, might demand inversion of the hedonic polarities of the opponent processes induced by running. In this framework, the acquisition of pica reflects development of the unpleasant nausea state across days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author is not prepared to offer any certain explanation for this kind of behavioral inertia or Bresistance to change.^A related question to be clarified is acquisition of pica over running days because this might be another case of Bresistance to change.Ô therwise, the strength of discomfort grows by repeated opportunities of wheel running. It is noteworthy that we have once claimed that the opponent-process theory of motivation (Solomon, 1980;Solomon & Corbit, 1974) is applicable to rats' running-based place avoidance (Masaki & Nakajima, 2008), where we speculated that repeated experience of running might evoke a initially large but gradually dwindling unpleasant physiological state as the Ba-process^and a secondary but gradually developing pleasant state as the Bb-process.^The acquisition of pica across days, however, might demand inversion of the hedonic polarities of the opponent processes induced by running. In this framework, the acquisition of pica reflects development of the unpleasant nausea state across days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a food reward, or a painful stimulus) [ 15 ]. The CPP test has also been used for assessing conditioning effects of other stimuli relevant from an animal welfare perspective, such as access to a running wheel in rats [ 16 ] and aversive stimuli in chickens [ 17 ]. Chickens also develop a CPP in response to food [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disruptions in lever pressing due to pre-session injections of d-amphetamine or cocaine are similar in both wheel- and sucrose-maintained responding (Belke and Dunbar, 2001; Belke et al, 2005). In addition, Pavlovian procedures show that wheel-activity can produce a conditioned place preference (Belke et al, 2005), conditioned taste aversion (Forristall et al, 2007), and conditioned place avoidance (Masaki and Nakajima, 2008) depending on the temporal sequence of wheel/cue presentation. In aggregate the evidence shows that wheel activity can serve as a competing or substitute reward, which may thereby decrease drug seeking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%