2010
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2010.5434378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward error correction for 100 G transport networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
168
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
168
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pump tone at approximately 192.66 THz and two neighbouring carriers could not be used for data transmission due to strong amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) background from the pump EDFA. Two more directly adjacent channels exceeded the threshold of 4.5 × 10 −3 , but were still below the BER threshold of 1.5 × 10 −2 for soft-decision FEC with 20 % overhead [31]. Another four channels at the low-frequency end of the C-band were lost due to a mismatch on the transmission band of the C-band filters used to realize the demultiplexer.…”
Section: Transmission Impairments and Data Ratesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pump tone at approximately 192.66 THz and two neighbouring carriers could not be used for data transmission due to strong amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) background from the pump EDFA. Two more directly adjacent channels exceeded the threshold of 4.5 × 10 −3 , but were still below the BER threshold of 1.5 × 10 −2 for soft-decision FEC with 20 % overhead [31]. Another four channels at the low-frequency end of the C-band were lost due to a mismatch on the transmission band of the C-band filters used to realize the demultiplexer.…”
Section: Transmission Impairments and Data Ratesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…d, Section of the optical spectrum of the WDM data stream. e, Measured bit-error ratios (BER) of the transmitted channels for the single-comb and the interleaved-comb experiment, along with the BER thresholds [31] for error-free propagation when applying forward error correction schemes with 7 % overhead (4.5 × 10 −3 , dashed orange line) and 20 % overhead (1.5 × 10 −2 , dashed blue line), see Methods for details. For the interleaved-comb experiment, the outer 14 lines at the low-frequency edge of the L band were modulated with quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK) signals rather than 16QAM due to the low OSNR of these carriers.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though the P/C values beyond the center of the auto-correlated pulse tends to be larger than 3.2, the P/C value at the pulse center is the most important when the decision is carried out with good synchronization procedure. For this value of Q-factor, the bit error rate could be about 10 -3 which corresponds to forward error correction (FEC) limit [18]. The decoder output waveforms for 24 different decoder WHC codes with fixed SPC of {1, -1, 1, -1} are also calculated and shown in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Results For 2-d En/decodermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectral efficiency, i.e., the number of information bits sent in each polarization per symbol period, of these channels can be improved by joint design of modern coding and advanced modulation formats, so-called coded modulation (CM). Forward error correction (FEC) [4] has already become a vital part of optical transport network standards and has evolved in several generations [5]. CM schemes are known [6]- [8] to be superior to conventional FEC techniques with independent FEC and modulation designs, in the sense of requiring less signal power for the same amount of redundancy and the same bit-error ratio (BER).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%