2022
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward modelling the O3(a+b) GW transient mass distributions with bpass by varying compact remnant mass and SNe kick prescriptions

Abstract: We present forward modelling from the bpass code suite of the population of observed gravitational wave (GW) transients reported by the LIGO/VIRGO consortium (LVC) during their third observing run, O3(a+b). Specifically, we predict the expected chirp mass and mass ratio distributions for GW transients, taking account of detector sensitivity to determine how many events should have been detected by the current detector network in O3(a+b). We investigate how these predictions change by alternating between four d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with the most recent fiducial parameters 𝛼 = 100 +30 βˆ’20 km s βˆ’1 and 𝛽 = βˆ’170 +100 βˆ’100 km s βˆ’1 from Bray & Eldridge (2018), and 𝑀 NS the mass of a neutron star. We note that the Bray kick has an extra 𝑀 NS /𝑀 rem as a coefficient to 𝛽, as in Ghodla et al (2022). This factor was not present in the original kick proposed by Bray & Eldridge (2016), and has been introduced in work since then.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with the most recent fiducial parameters 𝛼 = 100 +30 βˆ’20 km s βˆ’1 and 𝛽 = βˆ’170 +100 βˆ’100 km s βˆ’1 from Bray & Eldridge (2018), and 𝑀 NS the mass of a neutron star. We note that the Bray kick has an extra 𝑀 NS /𝑀 rem as a coefficient to 𝛽, as in Ghodla et al (2022). This factor was not present in the original kick proposed by Bray & Eldridge (2016), and has been introduced in work since then.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We note that the fiducial value of the Bray kick does not lie on the Eldridge et al (2018) contour. This is due to modifications we have made in the BPASS code around the calculation of the rejuvenation age (for details on this, the reader is referred to Ghodla et al (2022), Section 2.1). The BNS merger rates reported by the LVK are given in Table 1, and shown against our F G data in Figure 1.…”
Section: Bns Merger Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we have used a satellite routine of the suite referred to as v1 to make additions in a post-processing manner (discussed below) to the models. was previously used in Ghodla et al (2022), but we name it here for the first time. Apart from the implementation discussed below in section 4.2, 4.3, we also consider pulsation pair-instability (PPI -see Woosley et al 2007) in by following the fits in Stevenson et al (2019) (eq.…”
Section: Bpass Input Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For determining the mass of the compact remnant, we use the standard remnant mass implementation in , (see, Ghodla et al 2022). Finally,…”
Section: Implementation Of Tidal Chementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows us to take a different approach when comparing observational systems and theory: instead of creating a model to match the observations as best as possible, we can search through our existing predictions and find systems which are similar to those observed (e.g. Xiao et al 2019;Tang et al 2020;Stanway et al 2020;Stevance et al 2020;Stevance & Eldridge 2021;Byrne et al 2021;Briel et al 2022;Chrimes et al 2022;Ghodla et al 2022;Stevance et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%