2020
DOI: 10.1364/boe.384539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward multiple scattering dominates speckle decorrelation in whole-blood flowmetry using optical coherence tomography

Abstract: Quantitative blood flow measurements using optical coherence tomography (OCT) have a wide potential range of medical research and clinical applications. Flowmetry based on the temporal dynamics of the OCT signal may have the ability to measure three-dimensional flow profiles regardless of the flow direction. State-of-the-art models describing the OCT signal temporal statistics are based on dynamic light scattering (DLS), a model which is inherently limited to single scattering regimes. DLS methods continue to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2(a) that the DBS signal is affected by multiple-scattering as has been described Ref. [14]. Although we referred to these signals as DBS, they would be more accurately labelled DBS+DFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2(a) that the DBS signal is affected by multiple-scattering as has been described Ref. [14]. Although we referred to these signals as DBS, they would be more accurately labelled DBS+DFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Ferris et al. 49 used phantom data to study the effects of multiple scattering on the speckle decorrelation. Their conclusions confirm that speckle decorrelation is dependent on parameters such as the concentration and size of particles and velocity field inhomogeneities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the reviewed works, the authors aimed to further understand the physical meaning of the light speckle and how to model it mathematically. 3 , 16 , 17 , 21 , 39 , 40 , 49 , 53 , 55 Although its interpretability remains a challenging task, a number of works have shown the feasibility of speckle-derived quantifications for biomedical imaging related tasks, including classification (e.g., healthy/pathological), 1 , 2 , 4 , 8 , 12 14 , 23 26 , 32 34 , 37 , 43 46 segmentation (e.g., vessels), 15 motion quantification (when dynamic data is provided), 6 , 48 , 49 , 51 53 and image fidelity. 54 Nevertheless, some aspects and limitations of those techniques should be discussed to improve future works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%