Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference. 1999 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 21st Annual Conference and T
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.1999.802515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward problem solution of ESI using FEM and BEM with quadratic isoparametric elements

Abstract: A b --% -' ' 'ans d the ilmtcdlular electriCanradofi3CtiVeCellpogulatiollsinthebIaiUbased an reamled scalp patentials are called electric saume images (ESIS). For auxuate ilmprem 'on dthe meaQlred data it is neuxsaq to develop numerical models that the correct gemmy awl electrical propaties numerical models that enoploy q d m t i c isopararmetn 'C BomJary Element Method @Ea& The solutions are ~T h i s p e p a pnesentsthesolutionsdhtwo elements: th Finite Elemcat Metbod 0 and the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While FEM potentially allows more accurate head models using more tissue types and allowing specification of tissue anisotropy, generating these models requires extra information such as direction anisotropy information gleaned from diffusion tensor (DT) images. For isotropic head models, BEM is at least as accurate as FEM and also provides better control over source dipole locations (Acar and Gençer, 1999). …”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While FEM potentially allows more accurate head models using more tissue types and allowing specification of tissue anisotropy, generating these models requires extra information such as direction anisotropy information gleaned from diffusion tensor (DT) images. For isotropic head models, BEM is at least as accurate as FEM and also provides better control over source dipole locations (Acar and Gençer, 1999). …”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is based on the concentric three-spheres model with an additional inhomogeneity intersecting the outer-skull layer to model a single eye. Since an analytical solution is not possible for such a head geometry, the numerical solutions are compared with the results obtained by FEM ( Özdemir and Genc ¸er 1997, Acar and Genc ¸er 1999, Genc ¸er et al 2003.…”
Section: Validation Of the Intersecting Meshesmentioning
confidence: 99%