2019
DOI: 10.1364/josab.36.002079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward stimulated Brillouin scattering in optical nanofibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 16 ] The linewidth Γnormalm of the m th FSBS resonant frequency that was related to the R0,m acoustic mode was given by Γnormalm=Γm,int+Γmir, where Γm,int was an acoustic mode–dependent inherent parameter that was related to the fiber cladding inhomogeneity and acoustic dissipation, and might be assumed as Γm,int=Ωnormalm/1000. [ 17 ] In addition, Γmir was boundary related and independent of the choice of m, which was govern by [ 15,18 ] false| ZnormalfZ false|Znormalf+Z=exp[ 12Γmirtnormalr]where Znormalf is the mechanical impedance of the fiber and Z is the acoustic impedance of the environment, while tnormalr is the acoustic propagation delay across the fiber diameter. The nonlinear optomechanical coefficient of FSBS gain induced by each acoustic mode could be given byγfalse(normalmfalse)false(Ωfalse)=γ0false(normalmfalse)11+[ΩΩnormalm]2/false[ 12Γnormalm false]2where the maximum value γ0false(normalmfalse) is obtained on the resonant frequency of …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[ 16 ] The linewidth Γnormalm of the m th FSBS resonant frequency that was related to the R0,m acoustic mode was given by Γnormalm=Γm,int+Γmir, where Γm,int was an acoustic mode–dependent inherent parameter that was related to the fiber cladding inhomogeneity and acoustic dissipation, and might be assumed as Γm,int=Ωnormalm/1000. [ 17 ] In addition, Γmir was boundary related and independent of the choice of m, which was govern by [ 15,18 ] false| ZnormalfZ false|Znormalf+Z=exp[ 12Γmirtnormalr]where Znormalf is the mechanical impedance of the fiber and Z is the acoustic impedance of the environment, while tnormalr is the acoustic propagation delay across the fiber diameter. The nonlinear optomechanical coefficient of FSBS gain induced by each acoustic mode could be given byγfalse(normalmfalse)false(Ωfalse)=γ0false(normalmfalse)11+[ΩΩnormalm]2/false[ 12Γnormalm false]2where the maximum value γ0false(normalmfalse) is obtained on the resonant frequency of …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15 ] It could be inferred that the nonlinear coefficient and the linewidth of FSBS would differ as the fiber geometric size changes, since QESfalse(normalmfalse),QPEfalse(normalmfalse),andΓnormalm were all radial parameters dependent. For the excitation of multiple acoustic modes, the total FSBS gain can be expressed as [ 17 ] gfalse(Ωfalse)=normalmγ0false(normalmfalse)11+[ΩΩnormalm]2/false[ 12Γnormalm false]2…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to elastic light scattering, the abundant inelastic scattering effects in microfibers also provide useful tools for sensing applications. Recently, Brillouin scattering in microfiber has attracted increasing interest because the microfiber can strongly confine both optical and acoustic modes at a nanoscale and provide a unique platform to investigate photon-phonon interactions [247][248][249][250][251][252][253]. For optical sensing, Brillouin scattering may benefit the sensitivity and compactness of microfiber sensors, owing to the rise of surface acoustic waves.…”
Section: Frequency-based Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we propose a new solution to realize SPDC in fibers using a tapered standard telecommunication fiber [19][20][21][22][23]. The second-order nonlinearity is established through surface dipole and bulk multipole nonlinearities, that are exalted due to the sub-wavelength diameter of the nanofiber.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%