2019
DOI: 10.2988/18-d-18-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fossil Acropora prolifera (Lamarck, 1816) reveals coral hybridization is not only a recent phenomenon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reef coral genus Acropora is solely represented on modern western Atlantic reefs by two important reef-front species, A. cervicornis (Lamarck, 1816) and A. palmata (Lamarck, 1816) (the cervicornis group), as well as their persistent F1 hybrid, which is currently recognized as a third species, A. prolifera (Lamarck, 1816) (Aronson et al, 2008a, b; Japaud et al, 2014; Anguila-Perera and Hernández-Landa, 2018; Nylander-Asplin, 2018; Precht et al, 2019; Hoeksema and Cairns, 2020). Acropora is furthermore represented in the fossil record of the western Atlantic, including three named and several still to be described species from the Caribbean and North, Central, and South America (Vaughan, 1919; Weisbord, 1973; Budd et al, 1994; Wallace, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reef coral genus Acropora is solely represented on modern western Atlantic reefs by two important reef-front species, A. cervicornis (Lamarck, 1816) and A. palmata (Lamarck, 1816) (the cervicornis group), as well as their persistent F1 hybrid, which is currently recognized as a third species, A. prolifera (Lamarck, 1816) (Aronson et al, 2008a, b; Japaud et al, 2014; Anguila-Perera and Hernández-Landa, 2018; Nylander-Asplin, 2018; Precht et al, 2019; Hoeksema and Cairns, 2020). Acropora is furthermore represented in the fossil record of the western Atlantic, including three named and several still to be described species from the Caribbean and North, Central, and South America (Vaughan, 1919; Weisbord, 1973; Budd et al, 1994; Wallace, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within each region, further population structure is observed but the specifics differ between species, with A. cervicornis showing generally more fine‐scale differentiation than A. palmata (Baums et al, 2005, 2006; Devlin‐Durante & Baums, 2017; Drury et al, 2016; Hemond & Vollmer, 2010; Vollmer & Palumbi, 2002, 2006). A. palmata and A. cervicornis have been present in the fossil record since the late Pliocene (~2.6–3.6 million years ago) whereas the hybrid is mostly absent from the fossil record (Budd & Johnson, 1999; McNeill et al, 1997; Precht et al, 2019). Regardless of the differences in evolutionary history and population structure among the Caribbean acroporids, their ecological success is tied to the presence of S .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within each region, further population structure is observed but the specifics differ between species with A. cervicornis showing generally more fine-scale differentiation then A. palmata (Baums et al 2005(Baums et al , 2006Devlin-Durante & Baums 2017;Hemond & Vollmer 2010;Kitchen et al 2019;Vollmer & Palumbi 2002. A. palmata and A. cervicornis have been present in the fossil record since the late whereas the hybrid A. prolifera is mostly absent from the fossil record (Budd & Johnson 1999;McNeill, Budd, & Borne 1997;Precht, Vollmer, Modys, & Kaufman 2019). Although A. prolifera produces viable eggs and sperm, molecular analyses indicates that F2 adults are very rare or absent while backcrosses with either parent species occur occassionally (Kitchen et al 2020;Van Oppen, Willis, Vugt, & Miller 2000;Vollmer & Palumbi 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%