1990
DOI: 10.1016/0034-6667(90)90104-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fossil charcoal: techniques and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Charcoal fragments were retrieved using a method adapted from Whitlock and Millspaugh (1996). Charcoal pieces were identified as brittle, black opaque fragments having a submetallic lustre and showing cellular structure (Sander and Gee, 1990). The total number of fragments/cm 3 sediment was tabulated to determine charcoal concentration (Brown and Hebda, 2002), according to three size categories: >500, 250-500, and <250 mm).…”
Section: Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charcoal fragments were retrieved using a method adapted from Whitlock and Millspaugh (1996). Charcoal pieces were identified as brittle, black opaque fragments having a submetallic lustre and showing cellular structure (Sander and Gee, 1990). The total number of fragments/cm 3 sediment was tabulated to determine charcoal concentration (Brown and Hebda, 2002), according to three size categories: >500, 250-500, and <250 mm).…”
Section: Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residue that did not pass through the sieve was suspended in water in a gridded Petri dish and examined using a dissecting microscope at 40× magnification. Black fragments that were brittle and opaque with sub-metallic lustre and cellular structures were counted as charcoal (Sander and Gee, 1990). Charcoal flux (fragments cm −2 per year) was obtained by multiplying the number of fragments per 1 cm 3 of sediment (fragments cm −3 ) by the sedimentation rate (cm per year).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our calculation of particle volume assumed lengthto-breadth ratio of 2.0. The density of charcoal particles ranges from about 0.4 to 0.7 g cme3, depending mostly on porosity (Sander & Gee 1990) and less on the relative fractions of organic and elemental C (Goldberg 1985). We assumed a density of 0.5 g cme3 in our calculations to transform area estimates to mass fluxes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%