2002
DOI: 10.1671/0272-4634(2002)022[0299:flftjk]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fossil lizards from the Jurassic Kota Formation of India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Until recently, representatives of modern lizard families were well represented in the Cenozoic fossil record but poorly known in Mesozoic strata. Our results support the hypothesis that modern lizard families had diversified at least by the Late Jurassic (Macey et al 1997b;Evans et al 2002) as indicated by numerous recently discovered Mesozoic fossils (see Evans et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Until recently, representatives of modern lizard families were well represented in the Cenozoic fossil record but poorly known in Mesozoic strata. Our results support the hypothesis that modern lizard families had diversified at least by the Late Jurassic (Macey et al 1997b;Evans et al 2002) as indicated by numerous recently discovered Mesozoic fossils (see Evans et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…50 Myr ago (Windley 1988). Our analyses, combined with evidence from extinct terrestrial vertebrate groups (Buffetaut 1987;Evans et al 2002), support the hypothesis that these geological events introduced Gondwanan members into Asia as proposed by Macey et al (2000). Dinosaur fossils of Gondwanan affinities have been found on the Indian subcontinent in Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous sediments (Buffetaut Proc.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These results should be robust to additional data: the tree is consistent with trees obtained from molecular analyses of lepidosauromorphs with more nuclear genes and/or denser taxon sampling [15,16]. Tikiguana is not related to rhynchocephalians; in particular, the narrow tapering dentary without a posterodorsal 'coronoid' extension, reduced and dorsal symphysial contact point, as well as tooth implantation (successively pleurodont/acrodont/ pleuroacrodont anteroposteriorly) are typical of acrodontan lizards and not seen in early rhynchocephalians [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Analysis of the RAG1 data set used fossil calibrations across the Iguania to estimate the divergence between D. nobbi and D. sp. nov. Fossil calibrations included four fossils used in previously published studies: a middle Jurasic acrodont iguanian fossil (154-180 mya, Evans et al, 2002), an early Miocene sceloporine (,22.8 mya , Robinson and Van Devender, 1973) and an Chamaeleo/Rhampholeon fossil (18 mya, Rieppel et al, 1992), and a Pliocene Phrynocephalus fossil (5 mya, Zerova and Chkhikvadze, 1984). Specific BEAST settings for these calibrations are as per table 1 in Melville et al (2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%