2019
DOI: 10.1127/palb/2019/0065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fossil wood from the Neogene of the Kilyos coastal area in Istanbul, Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In several works there are comparisons between the fossil evergreen Quercoxylon and/or Lithocarpoxylon species with Quercus ilex – subgenus Lepidobalanus (e.g. Akkemik, Akkılıç, & Güngör, 2019; Mädel‐Angeliewa, 1968; Privé‐Gill, Cao, & Legrand, 2007) or subgenus Quercus section Quercus sensu Denk et al (2017). These comparisons are mainly based on the oaks' categorization in three types according to their wood anatomical characteristics, based on the work by Müller‐Stoll and Mädel (1957) and followed by Hadziev and Mädel (1962), Privé (1975), Gros (1983, 1988), and Selmeier (1986, 1992b): ‘White oak‐type’: with ring porous, closely spaced latewood vessels with thin walls, usually angular in cross‐section, numerous between two rays, with abrupt transition from early to latewood (logs of the mostly deciduous species of subgenus Quercus section Quercus sensu Denk et al, 2017; former Lepidobalanus and Macrobalanus sections of the genus Quercus ), ‘Red oak type’: with ring porous, latewood vessels relatively large, rounded, and thick‐walled (woods from the deciduous subgenus Quercus section Lobatae and some species of subgenus Quercus section Quercus sensu Denk et al, 2017; former sections of Erythrobalanus and Lepidobalanus , respectively), ‘Evergreen oaks’ of the genera Quercus and Lithocarpus , species of ‘sempervirent type’ with diffuse or semi‐ring porous, scanty, and relatively closely spaced vessels with radial pattern (radially oriented) with tendency to form aggregate rays (false rays).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several works there are comparisons between the fossil evergreen Quercoxylon and/or Lithocarpoxylon species with Quercus ilex – subgenus Lepidobalanus (e.g. Akkemik, Akkılıç, & Güngör, 2019; Mädel‐Angeliewa, 1968; Privé‐Gill, Cao, & Legrand, 2007) or subgenus Quercus section Quercus sensu Denk et al (2017). These comparisons are mainly based on the oaks' categorization in three types according to their wood anatomical characteristics, based on the work by Müller‐Stoll and Mädel (1957) and followed by Hadziev and Mädel (1962), Privé (1975), Gros (1983, 1988), and Selmeier (1986, 1992b): ‘White oak‐type’: with ring porous, closely spaced latewood vessels with thin walls, usually angular in cross‐section, numerous between two rays, with abrupt transition from early to latewood (logs of the mostly deciduous species of subgenus Quercus section Quercus sensu Denk et al, 2017; former Lepidobalanus and Macrobalanus sections of the genus Quercus ), ‘Red oak type’: with ring porous, latewood vessels relatively large, rounded, and thick‐walled (woods from the deciduous subgenus Quercus section Lobatae and some species of subgenus Quercus section Quercus sensu Denk et al, 2017; former sections of Erythrobalanus and Lepidobalanus , respectively), ‘Evergreen oaks’ of the genera Quercus and Lithocarpus , species of ‘sempervirent type’ with diffuse or semi‐ring porous, scanty, and relatively closely spaced vessels with radial pattern (radially oriented) with tendency to form aggregate rays (false rays).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transversal, tangential and radial sections were taken and all microscopic descriptions and photographing were performed on these three sections. The IAWA terminology for coniferous woods (Wheeler et al & Schneider 2006;Philippe & Bamford 2008;Süss & Velitzelos 1994a, b, 2009, 2010Akkemik et al 2016;Blokhina & Bondarenko 2016;Iamandei et al 2016a, b;Wang et al 2017;Bayam et al 2018;Sakala et al 2018;Mantzouka et al 2019;Güngör et al 2019) were used in the descriptions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This record includes petrified woods (e.g. Sayadi 1973;Selmeier 1990Selmeier , 2001Kayacık et al 1995;Akkemik et al 2005Akkemik et al , 2009Akkemik et al , 2017Akkemik et al , 2018Akkemik & Sakınç 2013;Bayam et al 2018;Iamandei et al 2018;Güngör et al 2019), macrofossils (e.g. Kasaplıgil 1977;Denk et al 2017a, b, c;Güner et al 2017) and fossil pollen (e.g., Sancay et al 2006;Yavuz-Işık 2007;Karlıoğlu et al 2009;Akkiraz et al 2011;Bouchal et al 2016Bouchal et al , 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such fossil forests also exist in Turkey. Studies on petrified in Turkey have increased recently on different geological periods ranging from the Oligocene Era to the Pliocene Era are the main fields of study are the East Thrace Ergene basin (Akkemik et al, 2005), Çamlıdere-Pelitçik village (Akkemik et al, 2009), Seben-Hoçaş village (Akkemik et al, 2016), Güdül (Akkemik et al, 2017), Haymana (Akkemik et al, 2018), Galatya Massive (Bayam et al, 2018), Gökçeada (Güngör et al, 2019) North of Istanbul (Akkemik et al, 2019) and around Kütahya (Akkemik et al, 2019). Fossil trees are generally difficult to come across as a whole, but rather encountered as remains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%