“…In several works there are comparisons between the fossil evergreen Quercoxylon and/or Lithocarpoxylon species with Quercus ilex – subgenus Lepidobalanus (e.g. Akkemik, Akkılıç, & Güngör, 2019; Mädel‐Angeliewa, 1968; Privé‐Gill, Cao, & Legrand, 2007) or subgenus Quercus section Quercus sensu Denk et al (2017). These comparisons are mainly based on the oaks' categorization in three types according to their wood anatomical characteristics, based on the work by Müller‐Stoll and Mädel (1957) and followed by Hadziev and Mädel (1962), Privé (1975), Gros (1983, 1988), and Selmeier (1986, 1992b): - ‘White oak‐type’: with ring porous, closely spaced latewood vessels with thin walls, usually angular in cross‐section, numerous between two rays, with abrupt transition from early to latewood (logs of the mostly deciduous species of subgenus Quercus section Quercus sensu Denk et al, 2017; former Lepidobalanus and Macrobalanus sections of the genus Quercus ),
- ‘Red oak type’: with ring porous, latewood vessels relatively large, rounded, and thick‐walled (woods from the deciduous subgenus Quercus section Lobatae and some species of subgenus Quercus section Quercus sensu Denk et al, 2017; former sections of Erythrobalanus and Lepidobalanus , respectively),
- ‘Evergreen oaks’ of the genera Quercus and Lithocarpus , species of ‘sempervirent type’ with diffuse or semi‐ring porous, scanty, and relatively closely spaced vessels with radial pattern (radially oriented) with tendency to form aggregate rays (false rays).
…”