2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foster youth and at-risk non-foster youth: A propensity score and structural equation modeling analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 94 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Being placed outside the birth home is not only associated with low educational attainment and unemployment but issues such as poor physical and mental health and involvement with the criminal system (Courtney & Dworsky, 2006; Jackson & Cameron, 2012; Kang‐Yi & Adams, 2017; Knorth et al, 2008). Although these types of health and social adversities predict low educational attainment on their own, they are more likely among youth placed outside the birth home even when adjusted for a number of socio‐economic and demographic background factors (Hobbs et al, 2021; Kääriälä et al, 2019). Within adolescents growing up in care, those with additional adversities (compared with those without), such as behavioural disorders, fare much worse on numerous issues (Kang‐Yi & Adams, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being placed outside the birth home is not only associated with low educational attainment and unemployment but issues such as poor physical and mental health and involvement with the criminal system (Courtney & Dworsky, 2006; Jackson & Cameron, 2012; Kang‐Yi & Adams, 2017; Knorth et al, 2008). Although these types of health and social adversities predict low educational attainment on their own, they are more likely among youth placed outside the birth home even when adjusted for a number of socio‐economic and demographic background factors (Hobbs et al, 2021; Kääriälä et al, 2019). Within adolescents growing up in care, those with additional adversities (compared with those without), such as behavioural disorders, fare much worse on numerous issues (Kang‐Yi & Adams, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%