Earth Observation Open Science and Innovation 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65633-5_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fostering Cross-Disciplinary Earth Science Through Datacube Analytics

Abstract: With the unprecedented increase of orbital sensor, in situ measurement, and simulation data there is a rich, yet not leveraged potential for obtaining insights from dissecting datasets and rejoining them with other datasets. Obviously, goal is to allow users to "ask any question, any time, on any size", thereby enabling them to "build their own product on the go".One of the most influential initiatives in EO is EarthServer which has demonstrated new directions for flexible, scalable EO services based on innova… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to several reasons: (1) increasing volumes of data generated by EO satellites; (2) lack of expertise, infrastructure, or internet bandwidth to efficiently and effectively access, process, and utilize EO data; (3) the particular type of highly structured data that EO data represent introducing challenges when trying to integrate or analyze them; (4) and the substantial effort and cost required to store and process data limits the efficient use of these data (CEOS, 2017;Lewis et al, 2016;Purss et al, 2015). Therefore, EO data can be considered as Big Data, data that are too large, fast-lived, heterogeneous, or complex to get understood and exploited (Baumann, Rossi, et al, 2016). Consequently, we need new approaches to fully benefit from EO data and (1) unlock the information power of EO data; (2) broaden the use of EO data to a wider range of communities; and (3) support decisions-makers with the knowledge they require by systematically analyzing all available observations and convert them into meaningful geophysical variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to several reasons: (1) increasing volumes of data generated by EO satellites; (2) lack of expertise, infrastructure, or internet bandwidth to efficiently and effectively access, process, and utilize EO data; (3) the particular type of highly structured data that EO data represent introducing challenges when trying to integrate or analyze them; (4) and the substantial effort and cost required to store and process data limits the efficient use of these data (CEOS, 2017;Lewis et al, 2016;Purss et al, 2015). Therefore, EO data can be considered as Big Data, data that are too large, fast-lived, heterogeneous, or complex to get understood and exploited (Baumann, Rossi, et al, 2016). Consequently, we need new approaches to fully benefit from EO data and (1) unlock the information power of EO data; (2) broaden the use of EO data to a wider range of communities; and (3) support decisions-makers with the knowledge they require by systematically analyzing all available observations and convert them into meaningful geophysical variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the term EO data cube (or geospatial data cube, sometimes data cube only) has emerged to describe a new solution to store, organise, manage and analyse EO data (Baumann et al 2016(Baumann et al , 2018bGiuliani et al 2017;Purss et al 2015). EO data cube technology is tightly linked to the aforementioned term ARD (Baumann 2017a(Baumann , 2017bGiuliani et al 2017;Lewis et al 2016Lewis et al , 2017.…”
Section: Processing and Analysingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now possible to benefit from the computing power of these infrastructures while using interoperable processing services in a transparent manner, hiding the complexity of these infrastructure to users [68][69][70]. Such integration can help leveraging the capabilities of these infrastructures and support model-as-a-Service approaches, such as the GEO Model Web [71] or data cubes [18].…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%