Fostering Research Integrity through the promotion of fairness, equity and diversity in research collaborations and contexts: Towards a Cape Town Statement (pre-conference discussion paper)

Abstract

The World Conferences on Research Integrity have produced significant collaborative conference statements including the Singapore Statement on Research Integrity and more recently the Hong Principles on Researcher Assessment. The 7th World Conference on Research Integrity (7WCRI) takes place in Cape Town from the 29th May 2022 to 1st June 2022. The theme of the conference is Fostering Research in an unequal world. We have proposed the Cape Town statement on Fostering Research Integrity through the promotion of fairness, equity and diversity in research collaborations and contexts as the major collaborative output for this conference. This paper serves to introduce the reader and conference attendees to the motivation and thinking behind this proposal which will be discussed further at the conference.The proposed Cape Town Statement needs to accomplish two aims. First it must clearly demonstrate why inequity and unfair practices in research collaborations and contexts is a research integrity (RI) matter. Second it must identify some key values or principles and action guides that will address the issue of equity and fairness in research within the context of the complete research life cycle from research agenda setting and call to proposal development, through grant application, allocation and management of funding, data production, analysis, management and sharing, to outputs, translation, and evaluation.This background paper serves to outline the rationale and justification for the proposed Cape Town Statement as a major collaborative output of the 7WCRI. It is not in itself the proposed statement but rather represents a summary of some of the thought processes and contributions thus far. We argue that the domain of RI and previous WCRI RI statements have focused the RI project primarily at a micro and meso or project level, with researchers and institutions being the main target for guidance. The Cape Town Statement project aims to widen the lens, bring in a macro perspective and ensure that other role players, including those that support global research structures and systems, are brought into focus, and encouraged to take accountability for their own spheres of influence.

Genetic and Genomic Researchers’ Perspectives on Biological Sample Sharing in Collaborative Research in Uganda: A Qualitative Study

“…Interviewees expressed concern about inequity in sharing the benefits of collaborative genomic research and biobanking. Similar concerns have been raised by several scholars (Horn et al, 2022; Munung & de Vries, 2020; Mwaka et al, 2022; Rosenbloom et al, 2017; Yakubu et al, 2018). This has partly been attributed to the inequalities and power imbalances between collaborating partners and lack of appropriate ethical and legal frameworks (de Vries et al, 2017; Mwaka et al, 2022; Yakubu et al, 2018).…”

With equity in mind: Evaluating an interactive hybrid global surgery course for cross-site interdisciplinary learners

“…Collective course faculty selection, collaborative lecture delivery, joint selection of student groupings, and respect for institutional policies were a few ways that equity was pursued in the partnership. Available resources to help guide equity in international academic collaborations include the Fair Trade Learning Rubric, the Equity Tool for Valuing Global Health Partnerships [ 13 , 51 ], the research fairness initiative tool, and the THET principles in partnership for Global Health framework among others [ 52 , 53 ]. Evaluation of the course using the Fair Trade Learning rubric showed that mutuality of course leadership was ensured, and reasons for the partnership were understood and welcomed by diverse stakeholders, resulting in ideal institutional and learner theories of change.…”

Research integrity guidelines in the academic environment: The context of Brazilian institutions with retracted publications in health and life sciences

“…Brazil collaborates with institutions of higher and lower research capacity compared to its own institutions (Research in Brazil, 2018 ). Nevertheless, the cooperation among scientific institutions with unequal resources should consider balancing potentialities and fragilities to build trust and increase a research integrity culture (Schroeder et al, 2019 ; Horn et al, 2022 ).…”