2015
DOI: 10.22329/celt.v8i0.4227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fostering Student Engagement: Creative Problem-Solving in Small Group Facilitations

Abstract: Creative Problem-Solving (CPS) can be a transformative teaching methodology that supports a dialogical learning atmosphere that can transcend the traditional classroom and inspire excellence in students by linking real life experiences with the curriculum. It supports a sense of inquiry that incorporates both experiential learning and the development of critical thinking skills. Incorporating active learning strategies in a way that transcends the classroom and sparks interest and passion for students is an im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of Creative Problem Solving (CPS) learning model is also an alternative for implementing the problem-based learning. Samson (2015) said that CPS is a learning model that can support and develop students' abilities, both learning activities and motivation. Students' learning activities are so well patterned through this model that they are more motivated to learn.…”
Section: Figure 1 Chart Of Tasc Model Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of Creative Problem Solving (CPS) learning model is also an alternative for implementing the problem-based learning. Samson (2015) said that CPS is a learning model that can support and develop students' abilities, both learning activities and motivation. Students' learning activities are so well patterned through this model that they are more motivated to learn.…”
Section: Figure 1 Chart Of Tasc Model Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bene ts participants mentioned in the interviews included the exibility and convenience of LMOOCs which echoed the statement of Schulze and Scholz (2018). Flexibility involved 'making it possible to observe others', ' tting learners' various personalities', and 'allowing interaction with different learners', items that re ect the theory of social learning (Clerehan et al, 2003;Miller & Lu, 2003;Samson, 2015); in contrast, convenience items 'allowing retrieval of materials' and 'helping learners learn and acquire knowledge' are advantages of computer-assisted learning.…”
Section: Discussion Limitations and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The bene ts participants mentioned in the interviews included the exibility and convenience of LMOOCs which echoed the statement of Schulze and Scholz (2018). Flexibility involved 'making it possible to observe others', ' tting learners' various personalities', and 'allowing interaction with different learners', items that re ect the theory of social learning (Clerehan et al, 2003;Miller & Lu, 2003;Samson, 2015); in contrast, convenience items 'allowing retrieval of materials' and 'helping learners learn and acquire knowledge' are advantages of computer-assisted learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%