2018
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2018.1432351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fostering the post-development debate: the Latin American concept oftecnologia social

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been driven by a process wherein “technosolutionist experts” dominate the construction of the narrative around technology and establish “rhetorical closure”. This means that a given technological “solution is supposed to have reached stabilization, being already well defined, ready to use and able to solve the problem it sets out to solve” [ 131 ]. Such a paradigm has largely influenced the type of technologies and the population-level consequences seen so far [ 118 ].…”
Section: Implications For Policy-makers Practitioners Researchers Pub...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been driven by a process wherein “technosolutionist experts” dominate the construction of the narrative around technology and establish “rhetorical closure”. This means that a given technological “solution is supposed to have reached stabilization, being already well defined, ready to use and able to solve the problem it sets out to solve” [ 131 ]. Such a paradigm has largely influenced the type of technologies and the population-level consequences seen so far [ 118 ].…”
Section: Implications For Policy-makers Practitioners Researchers Pub...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics of innovation systems could not be fully understood and addressed without carefully examining technological appropriation processes which may vary according to the context [42]. This view requires to move away from the historical trend where "accredited" experts dominate the process of building and interpreting technology, leading to "rhetorical closure" [43]. Indeed, the lack of an inclusive dialogue about these innovations limits the possibilities of gaining a detailed understanding of the scientific, technological, social, and cultural issues innovation raises in LMICs and among historically marginalized communities and groups [44].…”
Section: Developing Responsible Sustainable and Inclusive Ai For Hementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em um mundo com recursos naturais limitados, o imperativo do crescimento econômico é apontado como insustentável por ser incompatível com os limites da natureza. Embora o crescimento, combinado ao paradigma do desenvolvimento b , tenha se sustentado sob o argumento de promover bem-estar às sociedades e seus indivíduos, muitos autores (e.g., HARCOURT, 2014;ASARA et al, 2015;BRAND, 2018;POZZEBON;FONTENELLE, 2018) questionam o alcance dessa meta em face aos diversos problemas sociais enfrentados, como o aumento da inequidade e da desigualdade, defendendo a necessidade de se repensar o que é bem-estar.…”
Section: Contexto Socioeconômico Contemporâneounclassified