2006
DOI: 10.1080/15017410600570972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foucault and the Government of Disability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I believe that disability studies have much to learn from feminist and social studies of science, technology and medicine Á and vice versa Á on these issues. In the last few years, the exchange between these academic fields has increased (Galis 2006;Goggin and Newell 2003;Winance 2007;Struhkamp 2004;Moser 2003;Didrich 2005;Tremain 2005), and the ambition here is to contribute to this traffic and circulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I believe that disability studies have much to learn from feminist and social studies of science, technology and medicine Á and vice versa Á on these issues. In the last few years, the exchange between these academic fields has increased (Galis 2006;Goggin and Newell 2003;Winance 2007;Struhkamp 2004;Moser 2003;Didrich 2005;Tremain 2005), and the ambition here is to contribute to this traffic and circulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers are familiar with, and have even used, Foucault"s concepts of power and knowledge to explore, often to very good effect, the way in which individuals with learning disabilities and other kinds of special needs are controlled and constrained 5 within schooling contexts (Allan, 1999;Reid & Valle, 2004;Tremain, 2005). Whilst such analyses provide important insights, they offer little hope that individuals can escape such constraints.…”
Section: Transgressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Normality is a privileged, yet strikingly vacant and difficult to define, category which gains its existence and status from its relationship to the constitutive disavowal of abnormality (Tremain 2005;Campbell 2009;Shildrick 2009). As Shakespeare (1994) puts it, disability functions as a 'dustbin for disavowal' for the category of normality.…”
Section: Normality and Disability: Intersections Among Norms Law Anmentioning
confidence: 99%