1993
DOI: 10.2307/258907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foucault, Power/Knowledge, and Its Relevance for Human Resource Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
273
0
39

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(320 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
273
0
39
Order By: Relevance
“…The article by Townley (1993) shows that the positivist approach to the HR area is in perfect harmony with the classic view of Administration, in which the main objective of organizations would be to seek a stable efficiency that is adapted to its system. In this context, the HR function is one of the means by which organizations can achieve their stabilizing objectives.…”
Section: Hrm As a Functionalist And/or Positive Sciencementioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The article by Townley (1993) shows that the positivist approach to the HR area is in perfect harmony with the classic view of Administration, in which the main objective of organizations would be to seek a stable efficiency that is adapted to its system. In this context, the HR function is one of the means by which organizations can achieve their stabilizing objectives.…”
Section: Hrm As a Functionalist And/or Positive Sciencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most critical authors in the field classify HRM as functionalist, and several (such as Townley, 1993) as both functionalist and positivist. The article by Townley (1993) shows that the positivist approach to the HR area is in perfect harmony with the classic view of Administration, in which the main objective of organizations would be to seek a stable efficiency that is adapted to its system.…”
Section: Hrm As a Functionalist And/or Positive Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Others – mainly in the field of critical management studies – have understood this in terms of identity regulation (Alvesson and Willmott ) or socioideological control (Alvesson and Kärreman ). Barbara Townley (:528–529) claimed that personality tests and attitude measurements are “arrangements for ranking,” which “provide a grid of codability of personal attributes,” placing individuals on “comparative scalar measures.” Such tests and measures often fall under the rubric of human resource management (HRM), a field that is, given what is stated above, clearly susceptible to a Marxist critique of an obsession with the individual – or as Rose would put it: “the apotheosis of the celebration of the individual in capitalist ideology” (:219). Psychological tests and measures may gain notoriety among employees, for they can easily bring competition to a next level (i.e., from competition on the basis of output and work performance to levels of the “psyche,” the “hearts and minds,” “cultural values,” and so on).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%