2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.02.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fouling in gravity driven Point-of-Use drinking water treatment systems

Abstract: h i g h l i g h t sFouling in membrane based Point-of-Use drinking water systems was studied. Flux stabilization was observed for hollow fiber membrane configuration. Two different fouling mechanisms evolved in inside/out vs outside/in configuration. Intermittently operated inside/out membrane resulted in lowest hydraulic resistance. a r t i c l e i n f o Intermittent operation resulted in lower overall hydraulic resistances compared to continuously operated systems. This was due to the low organic loading and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the problems with the prolonged use of filters is the potential build-up of biofouling on the surface of the filter [66].…”
Section: Filtration and Biosolidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the problems with the prolonged use of filters is the potential build-up of biofouling on the surface of the filter [66].…”
Section: Filtration and Biosolidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Point-of-use (POU) water treatment technologies combine physical and biological treatments (Chawla et al 2017) in a smart and cheap solution to rural and urban areas where access to drinking water is limited or nonexistent (Kennedy et al 2012); that is, it is an accessible and easy to implement technology. One of the most promising POU technologies is the biosand filter (BSF), distributed worldwide by nonprofit organizations (Chan et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…challenge (i)). Due to the low flux, GDM systems require a relatively higher specific membrane filtration area per unit module volume compared with conventional systems [8,10], which impacts the total cost (estimated membrane cost at around 25 USD m -2 [11]) (i.e. challenge (ii)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Squirt [21], SkySpod [22], LifeStraw community [23] and ZeroTWO™ [24]). For all of these systems membrane fouling remains a core issue, although several fouling reduction techniques have been proposed, including membrane surface relaxation [11,17,25,26] and periodic application of shear stress (e.g. flushing [11,17,25] and backwashing [27]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%