2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-018-1303-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fouling Microbial Communities on Plastics Compared with Wood and Steel: Are They Substrate- or Location-Specific?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
5
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, it remains challenging to determine if specific polymers select for a specific microbial community across a broader scale of environmental settings. Variations in microbial communities may originate from investigations conducted in different geographical locations with different environmental conditions ( Oberbeckmann et al, 2018 ; Kesy et al, 2019 ; Li et al, 2019 ; Muthukrishnan et al, 2019 ; Erni-Cassola et al, 2020 ; Wright et al, 2020 ). Moreover, the differences in experimental design make it challenging to clearly determine in how far differences in microbial community structure depend on the polymer type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, it remains challenging to determine if specific polymers select for a specific microbial community across a broader scale of environmental settings. Variations in microbial communities may originate from investigations conducted in different geographical locations with different environmental conditions ( Oberbeckmann et al, 2018 ; Kesy et al, 2019 ; Li et al, 2019 ; Muthukrishnan et al, 2019 ; Erni-Cassola et al, 2020 ; Wright et al, 2020 ). Moreover, the differences in experimental design make it challenging to clearly determine in how far differences in microbial community structure depend on the polymer type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muthukrishnan et al [108] investigated microbial biofouling at two locations in the Sea of Oman (Arabian Gulf) by comparing the microbial communities developed on PET and PE with those on steel and wood. Substrate and location-specific effects were found, with the bacterial genera Microcystis and Hydrogenophaga and the diatoms Licmophora and Mastogloia specifically attached to plastics, while Desulfovibrio and Pseudomonas spp.…”
Section: Mixed Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial members of the Plastisphere have been found to be: (i) different from communities that colonize other surfaces [25][26][27]; (ii) not different from communities that colonize other surfaces [28]; (iii) only different from communities colonizing other surfaces under specific environmental conditions [29,30] or at specific time points [31]; (iv) more diverse than other microbial communities [32]; (v) less diverse than other microbial communities [33,34]; (vi) potentially degrading the plastics that they colonize [35,36]; (vii) capable of degrading plastic additives [33,37,38]; and (viii) pathogenic and/or carrying antimicrobial resistance genes [39][40][41][42]. The marine Plastisphere has been heavily reviewed within the last year, e.g., [18,[43][44][45][46], and there are also several recent reviews on plastic biodegradation, e.g., [47][48][49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%