2020
DOI: 10.1002/wer.1392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fouling of membranes in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: Planktonic bacteria can have a significant contribution

Abstract: Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) for wastewater treatment show great potentials in the sustainable development of urban environments. However, fouling of membranes remains the largest challenge of MBR technology. Dissolved extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) are often assumed be the main foulant in MBRs. However, single bacterial cells are often erroneously measured as EPS in traditional spectrophotometric analysis of EPS in activated sludge, so we hypothesized that single cells in many cases could be the true… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, MBRs and MESs have problems that limit their overall performance. For example, membrane fouling is a major issue in MBR systems [16,17], which affects the overall performance and lifetime of the membranes and increases the operation costs and maintenance costs of the system [18,19]. Microorganisms, cell debris, colloids, solutes, and sludge flocs in wastewater are the main causes of membrane fouling in MBR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, MBRs and MESs have problems that limit their overall performance. For example, membrane fouling is a major issue in MBR systems [16,17], which affects the overall performance and lifetime of the membranes and increases the operation costs and maintenance costs of the system [18,19]. Microorganisms, cell debris, colloids, solutes, and sludge flocs in wastewater are the main causes of membrane fouling in MBR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many of them have severe limitations, such as the chemical precipitation method, which generates a large amount of toxic residue and leads to secondary pollution, while the electrochemical process is of high cost with low efficiency. Membrane separation is better and restricts the pollutants to pass into the mainstream; however, faces fouling after a particular time period [ 19 , 20 ]. The solid-phase extraction (SPE) technique has been considered a promising method due to its simple preparation, relatively low cost, ability to use both in batch and column procedures, faster kinetics, and high possibility to reuse the adsorbent [ 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%