Automating Instructional Design, Development, and Delivery 1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-78389-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foundations for Courseware Engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, much more attention has been paid to the development of tools, standards, software and infrastructure than to establishing what users -primarily teachers who design technologyenhanced learning activities -actually need. Such technology-led ventures take the risk that they will produce tools and resources that get disappointing levels of take-up, in part because the developments are based on untested assumptions about what users do, how they think and the contexts in which they work and use these tools (Norman and Draper 1986;Pirolli and Russell 1990;Goodyear 1993;van Rosmalen et al 2006;Laurillard 2008). *Corresponding author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…That is, much more attention has been paid to the development of tools, standards, software and infrastructure than to establishing what users -primarily teachers who design technologyenhanced learning activities -actually need. Such technology-led ventures take the risk that they will produce tools and resources that get disappointing levels of take-up, in part because the developments are based on untested assumptions about what users do, how they think and the contexts in which they work and use these tools (Norman and Draper 1986;Pirolli and Russell 1990;Goodyear 1993;van Rosmalen et al 2006;Laurillard 2008). *Corresponding author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%