1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-1588-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foundations of Mathematical Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For more see [24]. It is also straightforward to show the basic properties such as linearity and convexity of the soft approximator.…”
Section: Soft Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more see [24]. It is also straightforward to show the basic properties such as linearity and convexity of the soft approximator.…”
Section: Soft Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His approach is connected with the following problem: given a monotone operator M : X =t X*, it is possible to get a closed convex function q on X x X* such that q*(x*,x) = q(x,x*) for any (x,x*) € X x X* and f M ^ q ^ p M , where f M is the Fitzpatrick representation of M and p M = f M . A positive answer is provided here in the broader framework of generalised convexity and generalised monotonicity (see [1,14,15,27,29]). For the study of maximal monotone operators and their representations by convex functions (on spaces which are larger than X x X*), we refer to the recent monograph by Simons [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among dualities, a familiar class is formed by conjugacies (or conjugations), that is, dualities for which [14] and have been studied by a number of authors (see [1,6,11,16,19,18,15,22,23,26] and the references therein). It has also be shown by When W is a reflexive Banach space X, Y = X* and c is the evaluation (x,x*) >->• x*(x), this duality is close to the classical Fenchel conjugacy since it is composed of this conjugacy with the interchange of variables (x*,x) >-* (x,x*).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With such a family one can associate a notion of convexity, a polarity, and a conjugacy, as we now recall. We refer to [15], [26], [27], [54], [77], [85], [97], [99] for extensive treatments and axiomatic approaches; for the notion of polarity see also [29], [57], [58], [60], [97]. We say that a subset A of X is E-convex if it is an intersection of a family of elementary subsets of X.…”
Section: A General Framework: Dualities and Polaritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we adopt a more general framework since in microeconomics one usually set the problems in orthants or cones rather than in the whole spaces. The just defined conjugacy has the advantage of entering into the general framework of the Fenchel-Moreau conjugacy (see [53], [6] and many others references such as [27], [39], [38], [58], [66], [54], [77], [85]) for which the conjugate of f is given by relation (3) where c : X × Y → R := R ∪ {−∞, ∞} is an appropriate coupling function. In order to see that, it suffices to take for c the opposite of the indicator function ι F of (the graph of) F := (X × Y ) \E −1 , given by ι F (x, y) = 0 for (x, y) ∈ F, +∞ otherwise.…”
Section: A General Framework: Dualities and Polaritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%