2007
DOI: 10.1080/03640210701703659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foundations of Representation: Where Might Graphical Symbol Systems Come From?

Abstract: It has been suggested that iconic graphical signs evolve into symbolic graphical signs through repeated usage. This article reports a series of interactive graphical communication experiments using a 'pictionary' task to establish the conditions under which the evolution might occur. Experiment 1 rules out a simple repetition based account in favor of an account that requires feedback and interaction between communicators. Experiment 2 shows how the degree of interaction affects the evolution of signs accordin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

32
393
3
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(429 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
32
393
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This work bears some resemblance to a recent body of experimental work on the shared construction of communication systems (27)(28)(29)(30). Of particular relevance is a recent paper by Selten and Warglien (30) that demonstrates that pairs of participants sometimes can create structured and efficient communication systems over the course of repeated interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work bears some resemblance to a recent body of experimental work on the shared construction of communication systems (27)(28)(29)(30). Of particular relevance is a recent paper by Selten and Warglien (30) that demonstrates that pairs of participants sometimes can create structured and efficient communication systems over the course of repeated interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The major difference between the experiments described here and the work of Selten and Warglien is the role of intentional design. In Selten and Warglien's experiments, as in those of Galantucci (27) and Garrod et al (28,29), participants interact repeatedly with the explicit goal of arriving at a shared system for communication. Therefore the systems they construct are the outcome of conscious design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this simplification allows us to explore the consequences of the minimal level of interaction necessary to support cultural transmission, real language transmission features far richer forms of interaction and there is some evidence that such interaction may be necessary for certain types of communication system to emerge (see e.g. Garrod et al, 2007;2010). The effect of reciprocal interaction on the regularization of unpredictable variation is currently unknown, although one possibility is that regularization might actually occur more quickly due to alignment during interaction (Branigan, Pickering & Cleland, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, symbolic and structured communicative behaviours have been shown to arise through (communicative or learning) interactions between adults in laboratory contexts (e.g. Garrod et al, 2007;Kirby, Cornish & Smith, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In experiments, this happens both over episodes of communication (Garrod et al, 2007) and transmission (Caldwell & Smith, 2012). The signals become simpler and less transparent, and therefore more arbitrary for new learners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%